NSLYF
Price
$17.95
Change
-$0.66 (-3.55%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
6.84B
OCGPF
Price
$2.65
Change
-$0.45 (-14.52%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
480.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSLYF vs OCGPF

Header iconNSLYF vs OCGPF Comparison
Open Charts NSLYF vs OCGPFBanner chart's image
Nestle Malaysia BHD
Price$17.95
Change-$0.66 (-3.55%)
Volume$700
Capitalization6.84B
Oceana Group
Price$2.65
Change-$0.45 (-14.52%)
Volume$125
Capitalization480.5M
NSLYF vs OCGPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OCGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSLYF vs. OCGPF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSLYF is a Hold and OCGPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (NSLYF: $17.95 vs. OCGPF: $2.65)
Brand notoriety: NSLYF and OCGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSLYF: 218% vs. OCGPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- NSLYF: $6.84B vs. OCGPF: $480.5M
NSLYF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $6.84B. OCGPF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $480.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSLYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOCGPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NSLYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OCGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCGPF is a better buy in the long-term than NSLYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSLYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCGPF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSLYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OCGPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OCGPF is a better buy in the short-term than NSLYF.

Price Growth

NSLYF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OCGPF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.11% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSLYF($6.84B) has a higher market cap than OCGPF($480M). NSLYF has higher P/E ratio than OCGPF: NSLYF (50.51) vs OCGPF (14.35). OCGPF (-24.286) and NSLYF (-25.271) have similar YTD gains . OCGPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.57B vs. NSLYF (1.09B). OCGPF has more cash in the bank: 728M vs. NSLYF (30.8M). NSLYF has less debt than OCGPF: NSLYF (892M) vs OCGPF (3.84B). OCGPF has higher revenues than NSLYF: OCGPF (9.6B) vs NSLYF (6.93B).
NSLYFOCGPFNSLYF / OCGPF
Capitalization6.84B480M1,425%
EBITDA1.09B1.57B70%
Gain YTD-25.271-24.286104%
P/E Ratio50.5114.35352%
Revenue6.93B9.6B72%
Total Cash30.8M728M4%
Total Debt892M3.84B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSLYF vs OCGPF: Fundamental Ratings
NSLYF
OCGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9738
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1696
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6483
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7350
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCGPF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSLYF (54). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSLYF’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NSLYF (100). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to NSLYF’s over the last 12 months.

NSLYF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OCGPF (96). This means that NSLYF’s stock grew significantly faster than OCGPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSLYF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as OCGPF (83). This means that NSLYF’s stock grew similarly to OCGPF’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as NSLYF (73). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to NSLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSLYFOCGPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OCGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EQTY25.750.20
+0.80%
Kovitz Core Equity ETF
NCA8.440.03
+0.36%
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
UNOV36.630.04
+0.11%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF Nov
CHPS34.72-0.18
-0.50%
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
AMDD14.37-0.38
-2.61%
Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares

NSLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSLYF and QQFSF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSLYF and QQFSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSLYF
1D Price
Change %
NSLYF100%
N/A
QQFSF - NSLYF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYCF - NSLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDSYA - NSLYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TYCMY - NSLYF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
OCGPF - NSLYF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OCGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCGPF and PRBZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCGPF and PRBZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCGPF
1D Price
Change %
OCGPF100%
N/A
PRBZF - OCGPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUFBY - OCGPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - OCGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMG - OCGPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRSFF - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More