Ad is loading...
NSNCX vs WCMLX
NSNCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNCX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth C
Price$39.48
Change-$1.25 (-3.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets391.15M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.62
Change-$0.46 (-4.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.93M
NSNCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNCX has more cash in the bank: 391M vs. WCMLX (39.9M). NSNCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNCX (16 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). NSNCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.86). NSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). NSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). NSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.95 vs. WCMLX (-13.23). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 29.89 vs. NSNCX (23.18).
| NSNCX | WCMLX | NSNCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.99 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.86 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.057 | -13.841 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 391M | 39.9M | 980% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.95 | -13.23 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.40 | -5.46 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.18 | 29.89 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers