Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSNCX vs WCMLX
NSNCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNCX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth C
Price$50.64
Change+$0.50 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets505.52M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
NSNCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNCX has more cash in the bank: 506M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). NSNCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNCX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). NSNCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). NSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). NSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.57 vs. WCMLX (-3.04). NSNCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.51 vs. WCMLX (-0.83).
| NSNCX | WCMLX | NSNCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.99 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.79 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.567 | 1.788 | 255% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 506M | 41.3M | 1,225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.57 | -3.04 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.33 | 21.43 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.51 | -0.83 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.90 | N/A | - |