Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSNCX vs WCMLX
NSNCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNCX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth C
Price$49.25
Change+$0.36 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets465.66M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.58
Change+$0.21 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
NSNCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNCX has more cash in the bank: 466M vs. WCMLX (45M). NSNCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNCX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). NSNCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). NSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. NSNCX (6.05). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.93 vs. NSNCX (14.46).
| NSNCX | WCMLX | NSNCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.99 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.79 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.711 | 5.599 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 466M | 45M | 1,036% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 6.59 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.24 | 28.23 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.46 | 20.93 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers