Ad is loading...
NSNCX vs WCMLX
NSNCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNCX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth C
Price$42.99
Change-$0.27 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets419.66M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.74
Change-$0.06 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.98M
NSNCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNCX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNCX has more cash in the bank: 420M vs. WCMLX (42M). NSNCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNCX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). NSNCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.86). NSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). NSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.40 vs. WCMLX (-6.97). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.04 vs. NSNCX (13.35).
| NSNCX | WCMLX | NSNCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.99 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.86 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.344 | -8.709 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 420M | 42M | 1,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.40 | -6.97 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.21 | 14.99 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.35 | 22.04 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...