Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSNCX vs WCMNX
NSNCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts NSNCX vs WCMNX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth C
Price$49.25
Change+$0.36 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets465.66M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.51
Change+$0.12 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
NSNCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNCX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNCX has more cash in the bank: 466M vs. WCMNX (45M). NSNCX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: NSNCX (16 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). NSNCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than WCMNX (2.04). NSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). NSNCX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMNX (6.35) and NSNCX (6.05) have marching annual gain over last year. WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.45 vs. NSNCX (14.46).
| NSNCX | WCMNX | NSNCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.24 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 2.04 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.711 | 5.516 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 466M | 45M | 1,036% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 6.35 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.24 | 27.40 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.46 | 19.45 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement