It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NSP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRANJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NSP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RANJF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
NSP (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +18.64% price change this week, while RANJF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +4.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.76%.
NSP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.
Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
NSP | RANJF | NSP / RANJF | |
Capitalization | 2.01B | 8.5B | 24% |
EBITDA | 126M | 558M | 23% |
Gain YTD | -29.879 | -13.386 | 223% |
P/E Ratio | 49.51 | 74.03 | 67% |
Revenue | 6.7B | 23.5B | 28% |
Total Cash | 456M | 278M | 164% |
Total Debt | 436M | 2.29B | 19% |
NSP | RANJF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RANJF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as NSP (23) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that RANJF’s stock grew similarly to NSP’s over the last 12 months.
RANJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NSP (100) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that RANJF’s stock grew similarly to NSP’s over the last 12 months.
NSP's SMR Rating (30) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RANJF (89) in the null industry. This means that NSP’s stock grew somewhat faster than RANJF’s over the last 12 months.
RANJF's Price Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as NSP (86) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that RANJF’s stock grew similarly to NSP’s over the last 12 months.
RANJF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as NSP (7) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that RANJF’s stock grew similarly to NSP’s over the last 12 months.
NSP | RANJF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago19% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago18% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago59% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
LSAF | 42.57 | 0.29 | +0.68% |
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor® US Cr Eq ETF | |||
SIXD | 27.82 | 0.07 | +0.24% |
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Jun/Dec ETF | |||
DNL | 39.24 | 0.09 | +0.23% |
WisdomTree Global ex-US Qual Div Gr ETF | |||
EMLC | 25.21 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
VanEck JPMorgan EMLcl Ccy Bd ETF | |||
ROKT | 69.07 | -0.14 | -0.20% |
SPDR® Kensho Final Frontiers ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RANJF and CWLPF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RANJF and CWLPF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RANJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RANJF | 100% | N/A | ||
CWLPF - RANJF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
RANJY - RANJF | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
BBSI - RANJF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
KFY - RANJF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
NSP - RANJF | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.35% | ||
More |