Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSRSX vs WCMNX
NSRSX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMNX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6
Price$53.52
Change+$0.52 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets505.52M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
NSRSX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 506M vs. WCMNX (41.3M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: NSRSX (7 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than NSRSX (1.04). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). NSRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.34 vs. WCMNX (-3.30). NSRSX return over 5 years is better than : 5.91 vs. WCMNX (-2.13).
| NSRSX | WCMNX | NSRSX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.24 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.04 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.704 | 1.576 | 362% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 506M | 41.3M | 1,225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.34 | -3.30 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.43 | 20.47 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.91 | -2.13 | -278% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement