Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSRSX vs WCMNX
NSRSX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMNX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6
Price$49.28
Change+$0.49 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.66M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.51
Change+$0.11 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.42M
NSRSX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 447M vs. WCMNX (42.4M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: NSRSX (7 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than NSRSX (1.04). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). NSRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.06 vs. WCMNX (-6.27). NSRSX (17.57) and WCMNX (16.76) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NSRSX | WCMNX | NSRSX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.24 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.04 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.692 | -2.285 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 42.4M | 1,054% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.06 | -6.27 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.15 | 20.39 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.57 | 16.76 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers