Ad is loading...
NSRSX vs WCMNX
NSRSX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMNX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6
Price$42.33
Change-$2.39 (-5.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets410.53M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$10.66
Change-$0.85 (-7.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.58M
NSRSX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMNX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Hold and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 411M vs. WCMNX (41.6M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: NSRSX (7 years) vs WCMNX (5 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than NSRSX (1.04). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMNX (48.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). NSRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.12 vs. WCMNX (-10.22). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.98 vs. NSRSX (56.94).
| NSRSX | WCMNX | NSRSX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.24 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.11 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.810 | -9.299 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 411M | 41.6M | 988% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.12 | -10.22 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.65 | -7.10 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.94 | 60.98 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...