NSUPF
Price
$0.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
165.35M
PAAS
Price
$34.60
Change
+$1.02 (+3.04%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.63B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSUPF vs PAAS

Header iconNSUPF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts NSUPF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Northern Superior Resources
Price$0.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$259.78K
Capitalization165.35M
Pan American Silver
Price$34.60
Change+$1.02 (+3.04%)
Volume$6.51M
Capitalization14.63B
NSUPF vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSUPF vs. PAAS commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSUPF is a Hold and PAAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NSUPF: $0.95 vs. PAAS: $34.60)
Brand notoriety: NSUPF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSUPF: 115% vs. PAAS: 137%
Market capitalization -- NSUPF: $165.35M vs. PAAS: $14.63B
NSUPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $165.35M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $14.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSUPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NSUPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than NSUPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSUPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSUPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the short-term than NSUPF.

Price Growth

NSUPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.38% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4920.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($14.6B) has a higher market cap than NSUPF($165M). NSUPF YTD gains are higher at: 176.172 vs. PAAS (73.238). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. NSUPF (-15.04M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 900M vs. NSUPF (8.4M). PAAS has higher revenues than NSUPF: PAAS (3.12B) vs NSUPF (0).
NSUPFPAASNSUPF / PAAS
Capitalization165M14.6B1%
EBITDA-15.04M1.41B-1%
Gain YTD176.17273.238241%
P/E RatioN/A23.86-
Revenue03.12B-
Total Cash8.4M900M1%
Total DebtN/A804M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSUPF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
NSUPF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6492
SMR RATING
1..100
10085
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSUPF (96) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew significantly faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (92) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that NSUPF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (85) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NSUPF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that NSUPF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NSUPF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSUPFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSGUX53.650.67
+1.26%
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth C
GSVPX17.100.08
+0.47%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity P
PSSJX24.310.07
+0.29%
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index J
CECYX29.37-0.10
-0.34%
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Inst3
SEPIX13.38-0.08
-0.59%
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials I