NSUPF
Price
$0.41
Change
+$0.01 (+2.50%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
41.49M
PAAS
Price
$24.30
Change
+$0.46 (+1.93%)
Updated
May 23, 02:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.59B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSUPF vs PAAS

Header iconNSUPF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts NSUPF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Northern Superior Resources
Price$0.41
Change+$0.01 (+2.50%)
Volume$47.31K
Capitalization41.49M
Pan American Silver
Price$24.30
Change+$0.46 (+1.93%)
Volume$4.6K
Capitalization5.59B
NSUPF vs PAAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSUPF vs. PAAS commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSUPF is a Hold and PAAS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (NSUPF: $0.41 vs. PAAS: $23.85)
Brand notoriety: NSUPF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSUPF: 40% vs. PAAS: 80%
Market capitalization -- NSUPF: $41.49M vs. PAAS: $5.59B
NSUPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $41.49M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSUPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NSUPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than NSUPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSUPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSUPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NSUPF is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

NSUPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.95% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.03% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($5.59B) has a higher market cap than NSUPF($41.5M). NSUPF (19.004) and PAAS (18.963) have similar YTD gains . PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. NSUPF (-512.8K). PAAS has higher revenues than NSUPF: PAAS (2.02B) vs NSUPF (0).
NSUPFPAASNSUPF / PAAS
Capitalization41.5M5.59B1%
EBITDA-512.8K296M-0%
Gain YTD19.00418.963100%
P/E Ratio21.46N/A-
Revenue02.02B-
Total Cash3.74MN/A-
Total Debt73.4KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSUPF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
NSUPF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
527
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8482
SMR RATING
1..100
9280
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (14) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSUPF (95) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew significantly faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NSUPF (84) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (80) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NSUPF (92) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (58) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that NSUPF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NSUPF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSUPFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SURI14.600.08
+0.58%
Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF
IYH54.98N/A
N/A
iShares US Healthcare ETF
LTL86.56N/A
N/A
ProShares Ultra Communication Services
HMOP37.95N/A
N/A
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
BUFB32.30N/A
N/A
Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF

NSUPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSUPF has been loosely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSUPF jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSUPF
1D Price
Change %
NSUPF100%
+3.21%
MAG - NSUPF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PAAS - NSUPF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
SSVRF - NSUPF
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.57%
SAND - NSUPF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
EQX - NSUPF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
-1.04%
AEM - PAAS
83%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
WPM - PAAS
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
MAG - PAAS
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
HL - PAAS
78%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
CDE - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
More