NSUPF
Price
$1.14
Change
-$0.08 (-6.56%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
211.02M
RMRDF
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
178.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSUPF vs RMRDF

Header iconNSUPF vs RMRDF Comparison
Open Charts NSUPF vs RMRDFBanner chart's image
Northern Superior Resources
Price$1.14
Change-$0.08 (-6.56%)
Volume$530.85K
Capitalization211.02M
Radisson Mining Resources
Price$0.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$665.98K
Capitalization178.68M
NSUPF vs RMRDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSUPF vs. RMRDF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSUPF is a Hold and RMRDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (NSUPF: $1.14 vs. RMRDF: $0.46)
Brand notoriety: NSUPF and RMRDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSUPF: 177% vs. RMRDF: 142%
Market capitalization -- NSUPF: $211.02M vs. RMRDF: $178.68M
NSUPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $211.02M. RMRDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $178.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $107.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSUPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMRDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NSUPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMRDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NSUPF and RMRDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSUPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMRDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSUPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMRDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NSUPF is a better buy in the short-term than RMRDF.

Price Growth

NSUPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.56% price change this week, while RMRDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6092.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.13% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSUPF($211M) has a higher market cap than RMRDF($179M). NSUPF YTD gains are higher at: 231.511 vs. RMRDF (92.780). RMRDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.4M vs. NSUPF (-16.45M). RMRDF has more cash in the bank: 14.9M vs. NSUPF (9.94M). NSUPF (0) and RMRDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NSUPFRMRDFNSUPF / RMRDF
Capitalization211M179M118%
EBITDA-16.45M-2.4M685%
Gain YTD231.51192.780250%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash9.94M14.9M67%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSUPF vs RMRDF: Fundamental Ratings
NSUPF
RMRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6967
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6254
SMR RATING
1..100
9993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10085
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMRDF's Valuation (95) in the null industry is in the same range as NSUPF (96). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as NSUPF (62). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as NSUPF (99). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RMRDF (38). This means that NSUPF’s stock grew similarly to RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as NSUPF (100). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSUPFRMRDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EKJCX3.28N/A
N/A
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr C
TGVFX58.12N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dynamic Large Cap Growth A
FRINX12.26N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income A
GMAPX31.21N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts P
UIVNX12.97N/A
N/A
MFS Intrinsic Value R2

RMRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMRDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMRDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMRDF
1D Price
Change %
RMRDF100%
-0.34%
NSUPF - RMRDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-6.71%
IAUX - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
PAAS - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
CGLCF - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.41%
EQX - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.10%
More