NSUPF
Price
$0.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
165.35M
SAND
Price
$11.48
Change
+$0.26 (+2.32%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.38B
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSUPF vs SAND

Header iconNSUPF vs SAND Comparison
Open Charts NSUPF vs SANDBanner chart's image
Northern Superior Resources
Price$0.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$259.78K
Capitalization165.35M
Sandstorm Gold
Price$11.48
Change+$0.26 (+2.32%)
Volume$4.56M
Capitalization3.38B
NSUPF vs SAND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSUPF vs. SAND commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSUPF is a Hold and SAND is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NSUPF: $0.95 vs. SAND: $11.48)
Brand notoriety: NSUPF and SAND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSUPF: 115% vs. SAND: 61%
Market capitalization -- NSUPF: $165.35M vs. SAND: $3.38B
NSUPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $165.35M. SAND’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSUPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NSUPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SAND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAND is a better buy in the long-term than NSUPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSUPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAND’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSUPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NSUPF and SAND are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NSUPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.38% price change this week, while SAND (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4920.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAND is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAND($3.38B) has a higher market cap than NSUPF($165M). NSUPF YTD gains are higher at: 176.172 vs. SAND (105.735). SAND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 145M vs. NSUPF (-15.04M). SAND has more cash in the bank: 14.8M vs. NSUPF (8.4M). SAND has higher revenues than NSUPF: SAND (194M) vs NSUPF (0).
NSUPFSANDNSUPF / SAND
Capitalization165M3.38B5%
EBITDA-15.04M145M-10%
Gain YTD176.172105.735167%
P/E RatioN/A95.67-
Revenue0194M-
Total Cash8.4M14.8M57%
Total DebtN/A315M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSUPF vs SAND: Fundamental Ratings
NSUPF
SAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6469
SMR RATING
1..100
10088
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAND's Valuation (78) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as NSUPF (96) in the null industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as SAND (69) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that NSUPF’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's SMR Rating (88) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as NSUPF (100) in the null industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SAND (37) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that NSUPF’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSUPF (100) in the null industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew significantly faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSUPFSAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSMVX18.180.21
+1.17%
Jackson Square SMID-Cap Growth Inv
MGIBX40.840.21
+0.52%
MFS International Intrinsic Value B
TRMNX23.420.12
+0.52%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index
JSCZX17.360.07
+0.40%
JPMorgan US Small Company R2
SEHAX16.09-0.03
-0.19%
SEI US Equity Factor Allocation A (SIIT)