Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSVAX vs WCMFX
NSVAX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSVAX vs WCMFX
Columbia Small Cap Value II Inst
Price$14.09
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets868.39M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$11.71
Change-$0.06 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.41M
NSVAX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSVAX vs. WCMFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSVAX is a Buy and WCMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSVAX has more cash in the bank: 868M vs. WCMFX (61.4M). NSVAX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: NSVAX (1.38) vs WCMFX (0.00). NSVAX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: NSVAX (23 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NSVAX (1.11). NSVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). NSVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: NSVAX (2000) vs WCMFX (100000). NSVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.42 vs. WCMFX (-15.02). WCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.42 vs. NSVAX (11.14).
| NSVAX | WCMFX | NSVAX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.90 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.45 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.017 | -2.254 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 868M | 61.4M | 1,414% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.42 | -15.02 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.73 | 4.46 | -398% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.14 | 27.42 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.97 | N/A | - |