NTCPF
Price
$1.04
Change
+$0.01 (+0.97%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
305.69M
OMZNF
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.01 (-3.03%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
196.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTCPF vs OMZNF

Header iconNTCPF vs OMZNF Comparison
Open Charts NTCPF vs OMZNFBanner chart's image
Northisle Copper and Gold
Price$1.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.97%)
Volume$535.47K
Capitalization305.69M
Osisko Metals
Price$0.32
Change-$0.01 (-3.03%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization196.1M
NTCPF vs OMZNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NTCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTCPF vs. OMZNF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTCPF is a Hold and OMZNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (NTCPF: $1.04 vs. OMZNF: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: NTCPF and OMZNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTCPF: 148% vs. OMZNF: 12%
Market capitalization -- NTCPF: $305.69M vs. OMZNF: $196.1M
NTCPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $305.69M. OMZNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $196.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTCPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMZNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NTCPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMZNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMZNF is a better buy in the long-term than NTCPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTCPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMZNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTCPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMZNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NTCPF and OMZNF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NTCPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while OMZNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCPF($306M) has a higher market cap than OMZNF($196M). NTCPF YTD gains are higher at: 248.333 vs. OMZNF (30.250). NTCPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -11.74M vs. OMZNF (-15.9M). OMZNF has more cash in the bank: 86.1M vs. NTCPF (5.41M). NTCPF has less debt than OMZNF: NTCPF (148K) vs OMZNF (57.6M). NTCPF (0) and OMZNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NTCPFOMZNFNTCPF / OMZNF
Capitalization306M196M156%
EBITDA-11.74M-15.9M74%
Gain YTD248.33330.250821%
P/E RatioN/A5.02-
Revenue00-
Total Cash5.41M86.1M6%
Total Debt148K57.6M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTCPF vs OMZNF: Fundamental Ratings
NTCPF
OMZNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7021
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1699
SMR RATING
1..100
9896
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMZNF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as NTCPF (81). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew similarly to NTCPF’s over the last 12 months.

NTCPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OMZNF (99). This means that NTCPF’s stock grew significantly faster than OMZNF’s over the last 12 months.

OMZNF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as NTCPF (98). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew similarly to NTCPF’s over the last 12 months.

NTCPF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as OMZNF (43). This means that NTCPF’s stock grew similarly to OMZNF’s over the last 12 months.

OMZNF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NTCPF (100). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew significantly faster than NTCPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTCPFOMZNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSPUX45.13N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity R6
JMEEX67.26N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity R5
TGDIX17.60N/A
N/A
TCW Relative Value Large Cap I
FSCNX17.05N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% C
MSAQX24.46N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Asia Opp I

NTCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTCPF and TROUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTCPF and TROUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTCPF
1D Price
Change %
NTCPF100%
+0.97%
TROUF - NTCPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NLPXF - NTCPF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OBGRF - NTCPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMZNF - NTCPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
NWXPF - NTCPF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OMZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMZNF and PGEZF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMZNF and PGEZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMZNF
1D Price
Change %
OMZNF100%
-3.11%
PGEZF - OMZNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+6.86%
SMDZF - OMZNF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
CXOXF - OMZNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+10.55%
WLBMF - OMZNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.98%
SLVDF - OMZNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
More