NTES vs SOHU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTES is a Sell and SOHU is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NTES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSOHU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NTES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SOHU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NTES’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOHU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NTES’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SOHU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
NTES (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.37% price change this week, while SOHU (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
NTES is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
SOHU is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| NTES | SOHU | NTES / SOHU | |
| Capitalization | 67.1B | 356M | 18,848% |
| EBITDA | 28.4B | 24.6M | 115,447% |
| Gain YTD | -6.306 | 27.392 | -23% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.53 | 15.20 | 102% |
| Revenue | 102B | 601M | 16,972% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 960M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 35.3M | - |
NTES | SOHU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTES's Valuation (6) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOHU (39). This means that NTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOHU’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as SOHU (79). This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to SOHU’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's SMR Rating (41) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOHU (88). This means that NTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOHU’s over the last 12 months.
SOHU's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as NTES (60). This means that SOHU’s stock grew similarly to NTES’s over the last 12 months.
SOHU's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTES (88). This means that SOHU’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTES’s over the last 12 months.
| NTES | SOHU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RYFNX | 90.80 | 0.31 | +0.34% |
| Rydex Financial Services A | |||
| OAKEX | 19.41 | N/A | N/A |
| Oakmark International Small Cap Investor | |||
| PFSZX | 26.54 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| PGIM Jennison Financial Services Z | |||
| AFVLX | 22.87 | -0.27 | -1.17% |
| Applied Finance Select Investor | |||
| JGMAX | 27.42 | -0.48 | -1.72% |
| Janus Henderson Triton A | |||
NTES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTES has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTES jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTES | 100% | +1.51% | ||
| BILI - NTES | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| KC - NTES | 43% Loosely correlated | +8.60% | ||
| YMM - NTES | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| NETTF - NTES | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.28% | ||
| SOHU - NTES | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||
SOHU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOHU has been loosely correlated with NTES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOHU jumps, then NTES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOHU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOHU | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| NTES - SOHU | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| BILI - SOHU | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| COIN - SOHU | 34% Loosely correlated | +9.69% | ||
| YMM - SOHU | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
| COMP - SOHU | 31% Poorly correlated | -4.24% | ||
More | ||||