Advertisement
NTOIF vs SGU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTOIF is a StrongBuy and SGU is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NTOIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSGU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NTOIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SGU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NTOIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGU’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NTOIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SGU’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
NTOIF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +6.60% price change this week, while SGU (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +1.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +2.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.42%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil Refining/Marketing (+2.99% weekly)The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
| NTOIF | SGU | NTOIF / SGU | |
| Capitalization | 14.3B | 393M | 3,639% |
| EBITDA | -96M | 141M | -68% |
| Gain YTD | 53.333 | 6.063 | 880% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.17 | 6.92 | 306% |
| Revenue | 20.7B | 1.78B | 1,165% |
| Total Cash | 981M | 28.1M | 3,491% |
| Total Debt | 5.34B | 288M | 1,856% |
NTOIF | SGU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SGU's Valuation (16) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as NTOIF (30) in the null industry. This means that SGU’s stock grew similarly to NTOIF’s over the last 12 months.
SGU's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTOIF (100) in the null industry. This means that SGU’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTOIF’s over the last 12 months.
SGU's SMR Rating (49) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTOIF (92) in the null industry. This means that SGU’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTOIF’s over the last 12 months.
NTOIF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SGU (59) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that NTOIF’s stock grew similarly to SGU’s over the last 12 months.
NTOIF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGU (83) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that NTOIF’s stock grew significantly faster than SGU’s over the last 12 months.
| NTOIF | SGU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GCC | 20.46 | 0.04 | +0.19% |
| WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Stgy Fd | |||
| IIGD | 24.80 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | |||
| KORP | 47.16 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| American Century Dvrs Corp Bd ETF | |||
| BELT | 32.18 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF | |||
| DFEM | 30.87 | -0.17 | -0.55% |
| Dimensional Emerging Markets Cr Eq 2 ETF | |||
NTOIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NTOIF and NTOIY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTOIF and NTOIY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTOIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTOIF | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| NTOIY - NTOIF | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
| RBSFY - NTOIF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| JXHGF - NTOIF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SGU - NTOIF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CAPL - NTOIF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
SGU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SGU and SUN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGU and SUN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGU | 100% | N/A | ||
| SUN - SGU | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| CAPL - SGU | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| CTXAY - SGU | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| WKC - SGU | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
| DKL - SGU | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||