NTPIF
Price
$4.26
Change
+$0.15 (+3.65%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
248.31M
RMAX
Price
$8.90
Change
+$0.12 (+1.37%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
178.27M
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTPIF vs RMAX

Header iconNTPIF vs RMAX Comparison
Open Charts NTPIF vs RMAXBanner chart's image
Nam Tai Property
Price$4.26
Change+$0.15 (+3.65%)
Volume$18.37K
Capitalization248.31M
Re/Max Holdings
Price$8.90
Change+$0.12 (+1.37%)
Volume$393.16K
Capitalization178.27M
NTPIF vs RMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NTPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTPIF vs. RMAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTPIF is a Hold and RMAX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (NTPIF: $4.26 vs. RMAX: $8.90)
Brand notoriety: NTPIF and RMAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTPIF: 391% vs. RMAX: 161%
Market capitalization -- NTPIF: $248.31M vs. RMAX: $178.27M
NTPIF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $248.31M. RMAX’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $178.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTPIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMAX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NTPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMAX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTPIF is a better buy in the long-term than RMAX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTPIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMAX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTPIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMAX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMAX is a better buy in the short-term than NTPIF.

Price Growth

NTPIF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +6.50% price change this week, while RMAX (@Real Estate Development) price change was +10.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

RMAX is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.25% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTPIF($248M) has a higher market cap than RMAX($178M). RMAX has higher P/E ratio than NTPIF: RMAX (18.16) vs NTPIF (3.02). NTPIF YTD gains are higher at: -10.316 vs. RMAX (-16.589).
NTPIFRMAXNTPIF / RMAX
Capitalization248M178M139%
EBITDAN/A69.4M-
Gain YTD-10.316-16.58962%
P/E Ratio3.0218.1617%
RevenueN/A298M-
Total CashN/A94.3M-
Total DebtN/A466M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTPIF vs RMAX: Fundamental Ratings
NTPIF
RMAX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4687
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1283
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMAX's Valuation (26) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTPIF (80) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that RMAX’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTPIF’s over the last 12 months.

RMAX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NTPIF (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to NTPIF’s over the last 12 months.

NTPIF's SMR Rating (46) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMAX (87) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that NTPIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMAX’s over the last 12 months.

RMAX's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NTPIF (58) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to NTPIF’s over the last 12 months.

NTPIF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMAX (83) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that NTPIF’s stock grew significantly faster than RMAX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTPIFRMAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNBWX20.580.04
+0.19%
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term W
ELMFX18.810.02
+0.11%
Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Equity F
ECCPX49.76-0.05
-0.10%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr C
USAWX32.86-0.05
-0.15%
Victory Sustainable World
GEQZX63.94-0.20
-0.31%
GuideStone Funds Equity Index Investor

NTPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTPIF and RMR have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTPIF and RMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTPIF
1D Price
Change %
NTPIF100%
+3.65%
RMR - NTPIF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
RMAX - NTPIF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
FRPH - NTPIF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
KW - NTPIF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
HOUS - NTPIF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
More

RMAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMAX has been loosely correlated with HOUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMAX jumps, then HOUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMAX
1D Price
Change %
RMAX100%
+1.37%
HOUS - RMAX
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
EXPI - RMAX
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
CWK - RMAX
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
JLL - RMAX
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
MMI - RMAX
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
More