NTPIF
Price
$4.10
Change
+$0.05 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
291.87M
RMAX
Price
$8.26
Change
+$0.06 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
160.28M
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTPIF vs RMAX

Header iconNTPIF vs RMAX Comparison
Open Charts NTPIF vs RMAXBanner chart's image
Nam Tai Property
Price$4.10
Change+$0.05 (+1.23%)
Volume$900
Capitalization291.87M
Re/Max Holdings
Price$8.26
Change+$0.06 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization160.28M
NTPIF vs RMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NTPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTPIF vs. RMAX commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTPIF is a Hold and RMAX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (NTPIF: $4.10 vs. RMAX: $8.20)
Brand notoriety: NTPIF and RMAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTPIF: 19% vs. RMAX: 131%
Market capitalization -- NTPIF: $291.87M vs. RMAX: $160.28M
NTPIF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $291.87M. RMAX’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $160.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTPIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMAX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NTPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMAX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTPIF is a better buy in the long-term than RMAX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTPIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMAX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTPIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RMAX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NTPIF and RMAX are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NTPIF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while RMAX (@Real Estate Development) price change was -3.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

NTPIF is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.

RMAX is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.61% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTPIF($292M) has a higher market cap than RMAX($160M). RMAX has higher P/E ratio than NTPIF: RMAX (1111.11) vs NTPIF (4.23). NTPIF YTD gains are higher at: -13.684 vs. RMAX (-23.149).
NTPIFRMAXNTPIF / RMAX
Capitalization292M160M183%
EBITDAN/A26.6M-
Gain YTD-13.684-23.14959%
P/E Ratio4.231111.110%
RevenueN/A326M-
Total CashN/A82.6M-
Total DebtN/A484M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTPIF vs RMAX: Fundamental Ratings
NTPIF
RMAX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
215
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4687
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6456
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMAX's Valuation (40) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTPIF (74) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that RMAX’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTPIF’s over the last 12 months.

RMAX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NTPIF (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to NTPIF’s over the last 12 months.

NTPIF's SMR Rating (46) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMAX (87) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that NTPIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMAX’s over the last 12 months.

RMAX's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NTPIF (64) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to NTPIF’s over the last 12 months.

NTPIF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMAX (84) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that NTPIF’s stock grew significantly faster than RMAX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTPIFRMAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRTHY34.920.22
+0.65%
Brother Industries Ltd.
SWZNF4100.00N/A
N/A
Schweizerische Nationalbank
KYOCY11.78-0.08
-0.70%
Kyocera Corp.
ANLDF0.09N/A
-2.86%
Anfield Energy Inc.
AFMDQ0.05-0.02
-32.08%
Affimed N.V.

NTPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTPIF and RMR have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTPIF and RMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTPIF
1D Price
Change %
NTPIF100%
+1.23%
RMR - NTPIF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
RMAX - NTPIF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
FRPH - NTPIF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KW - NTPIF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
FPH - NTPIF
9%
Poorly correlated
+4.32%
More

RMAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMAX has been loosely correlated with EXPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMAX jumps, then EXPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMAX
1D Price
Change %
RMAX100%
-1.68%
EXPI - RMAX
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
CWK - RMAX
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
HOUS - RMAX
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
MMI - RMAX
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
JLL - RMAX
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
More