NVLHF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
23.57M
PGZFF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
28.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NVLHF vs PGZFF

Header iconNVLHF vs PGZFF Comparison
Open Charts NVLHF vs PGZFFBanner chart's image
Nevada Lithium Resources
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.24K
Capitalization23.57M
Pan Global Resource
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization28.65M
NVLHF vs PGZFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NVLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NVLHF vs. PGZFF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NVLHF is a Hold and PGZFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NVLHF: $0.10 vs. PGZFF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: NVLHF and PGZFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NVLHF: 4% vs. PGZFF: 69%
Market capitalization -- NVLHF: $23.57M vs. PGZFF: $28.65M
NVLHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $23.57M. PGZFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $28.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NVLHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePGZFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NVLHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PGZFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NVLHF is a better buy in the long-term than PGZFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NVLHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGZFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NVLHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PGZFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NVLHF is a better buy in the short-term than PGZFF.

Price Growth

NVLHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while PGZFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +10.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGZFF($28.6M) has a higher market cap than NVLHF($23.6M). PGZFF YTD gains are higher at: 30.890 vs. NVLHF (-46.566). NVLHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.39M vs. PGZFF (-6.74M). PGZFF has more cash in the bank: 4.4M vs. NVLHF (3.11M). NVLHF (0) and PGZFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NVLHFPGZFFNVLHF / PGZFF
Capitalization23.6M28.6M83%
EBITDA-2.39M-6.74M35%
Gain YTD-46.56630.890-151%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.11M4.4M71%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PGZFF: Fundamental Ratings
PGZFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NVLHFPGZFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NVLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKNIY14.840.05
+0.34%
Bankinter, S.A.
LYSFF4.50N/A
N/A
Leroy Seafood Group ASA
ACMTA38.15N/A
N/A
ACMAT Corp.
ENQUF0.17N/A
N/A
Enquest Plc,
QDROF0.03N/A
N/A
Quadro Resources Ltd.

NVLHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NVLHF and PGZFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVLHF and PGZFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVLHF
1D Price
Change %
NVLHF100%
-4.30%
PGZFF - NVLHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
VALE - NVLHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
BHSIF - NVLHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-13.04%
TGOLF - NVLHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRLRF - NVLHF
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
More

PGZFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGZFF and SGPTF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGZFF and SGPTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGZFF
1D Price
Change %
PGZFF100%
+2.90%
SGPTF - PGZFF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
NVLHF - PGZFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.30%
PMMCF - PGZFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNPNF - PGZFF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
LUCMF - PGZFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
More