Advertisement
NVS vs RHHBF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NVS is a Hold and RHHBF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NVS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRHHBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NVS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- RHHBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NVS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RHHBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NVS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- RHHBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
Price Growth
NVS (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -2.68% price change this week, while RHHBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -5.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
NVS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+0.63% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| NVS | RHHBF | NVS / RHHBF | |
| Capitalization | 198B | 251B | 79% |
| EBITDA | 18.3B | 19.1B | 96% |
| Gain YTD | 20.837 | 6.082 | 343% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.38 | 21.19 | 110% |
| Revenue | 46.7B | 60B | 78% |
| Total Cash | 14B | 7.51B | 186% |
| Total Debt | 26.3B | 25.4B | 104% |
NVS | RHHBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NVS's Valuation (16) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as RHHBF (16) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew similarly to RHHBF’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for RHHBF (100) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew significantly faster than RHHBF’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's SMR Rating (29) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for RHHBF (98) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew significantly faster than RHHBF’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as RHHBF (58) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew similarly to RHHBF’s over the last 12 months.
RHHBF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVS (83) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that RHHBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVS’s over the last 12 months.
| NVS | RHHBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 15 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
NVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVS has been closely correlated with GSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NVS jumps, then GSK could also see price increases.
RHHBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RHHBF and RHHBY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RHHBF and RHHBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RHHBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHHBF | 100% | -3.88% | ||
| RHHBY - RHHBF | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.69% | ||
| RHHVF - RHHBF | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.89% | ||
| NVS - RHHBF | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.59% | ||
| JNJ - RHHBF | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| ABBV - RHHBF | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.13% | ||
More | ||||