It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NVS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRHHVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NVS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RHHVF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NVS (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -3.18% price change this week, while RHHVF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -6.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.00%.
NVS is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
NVS | RHHVF | NVS / RHHVF | |
Capitalization | 198B | 251B | 79% |
EBITDA | 18.3B | 19.1B | 96% |
Gain YTD | 5.970 | -1.726 | -346% |
P/E Ratio | 23.38 | 19.34 | 121% |
Revenue | 46.7B | 60B | 78% |
Total Cash | 14B | 7.51B | 186% |
Total Debt | 26.3B | 25.4B | 104% |
NVS | RHHVF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RHHVF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as NVS (14) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that RHHVF’s stock grew similarly to NVS’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for RHHVF (100) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew significantly faster than RHHVF’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's SMR Rating (22) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for RHHVF (98) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew significantly faster than RHHVF’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as RHHVF (60) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew similarly to RHHVF’s over the last 12 months.
RHHVF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVS (87) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that RHHVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVS’s over the last 12 months.
NVS | RHHVF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago53% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago42% | 3 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago37% | 3 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago42% | 3 days ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago37% | 3 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago46% | 26 days ago55% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago43% | 3 days ago53% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago61% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago29% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BNIEX | 10.19 | -0.01 | -0.10% |
UBS International Sustainable Equity A | |||
PAIOX | 8.03 | -0.04 | -0.50% |
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps R6 | |||
IVVYX | 20.73 | -0.16 | -0.77% |
Delaware Ivy International Core Eq Y | |||
QLSGX | 28.15 | -0.55 | -1.92% |
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth R6 | |||
CGFYX | 78.79 | -1.78 | -2.21% |
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst3 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVS has been loosely correlated with AZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVS jumps, then AZN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RHHVF has been loosely correlated with RHHBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RHHVF jumps, then RHHBY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RHHVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RHHVF | 100% | -3.12% | ||
RHHBY - RHHVF | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
JNJ - RHHVF | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
NVS - RHHVF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
AZN - RHHVF | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
RHHBF - RHHVF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.66% | ||
More |