NVYTF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.01 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
56.79M
OCPNF
Price
$13.03
Change
-$0.20 (-1.51%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
20.63B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NVYTF vs OCPNF

Header iconNVYTF vs OCPNF Comparison
Open Charts NVYTF vs OCPNFBanner chart's image
Novacyt Clamart
Price$0.55
Change+$0.01 (+1.85%)
Volume$200
Capitalization56.79M
Olympus
Price$13.03
Change-$0.20 (-1.51%)
Volume$50.29K
Capitalization20.63B
NVYTF vs OCPNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NVYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OCPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NVYTF vs. OCPNF commentary
Jul 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NVYTF is a Buy and OCPNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2025
Stock price -- (NVYTF: $0.55 vs. OCPNF: $13.03)
Brand notoriety: NVYTF and OCPNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NVYTF: 188% vs. OCPNF: 394%
Market capitalization -- NVYTF: $56.79M vs. OCPNF: $20.63B
NVYTF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $56.79M. OCPNF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $20.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NVYTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOCPNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NVYTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OCPNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCPNF is a better buy in the long-term than NVYTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NVYTF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCPNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NVYTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • OCPNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NVYTF and OCPNF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NVYTF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +2.49% price change this week, while OCPNF (@Medical Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+1.93% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCPNF($20.6B) has a higher market cap than NVYTF($56.8M). OCPNF has higher P/E ratio than NVYTF: OCPNF (20.41) vs NVYTF (1.33). NVYTF YTD gains are higher at: -12.057 vs. OCPNF (-15.935). OCPNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 257B vs. NVYTF (-1.71M). OCPNF has more cash in the bank: 181B vs. NVYTF (102M). NVYTF has less debt than OCPNF: NVYTF (1.87M) vs OCPNF (340B). OCPNF has higher revenues than NVYTF: OCPNF (882B) vs NVYTF (95.8M).
NVYTFOCPNFNVYTF / OCPNF
Capitalization56.8M20.6B0%
EBITDA-1.71M257B-0%
Gain YTD-12.057-15.93576%
P/E Ratio1.3320.417%
Revenue95.8M882B0%
Total Cash102M181B0%
Total Debt1.87M340B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCPNF: Fundamental Ratings
OCPNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NVYTFOCPNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NVYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OCPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SG13.710.38
+2.85%
Sweetgreen
HBANM22.680.27
+1.20%
Huntington Bancshares
CFR137.540.68
+0.50%
Cullen/Frost Bankers
HHS3.76-0.01
-0.27%
Harte Hanks
QSI1.81-0.06
-3.21%
Quantum-Si

NVYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NVYTF and ARAY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVYTF and ARAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVYTF
1D Price
Change %
NVYTF100%
N/A
ARAY - NVYTF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
MBGNF - NVYTF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRCT - NVYTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
PCHM - NVYTF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POCI - NVYTF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More

OCPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCPNF has been loosely correlated with OLYMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCPNF jumps, then OLYMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCPNF
1D Price
Change %
OCPNF100%
N/A
OLYMY - OCPNF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
PLLWF - OCPNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POCI - OCPNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
NVYTF - OCPNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFGTF - OCPNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More