It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NVYTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOCPNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NVYTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCPNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
NVYTF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OCPNF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +3.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.85%.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
NVYTF | OCPNF | NVYTF / OCPNF | |
Capitalization | 40M | 13.2B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | 180B | - |
Gain YTD | -20.144 | -23.471 | 86% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 17.00 | - |
Revenue | N/A | 979B | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 275B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 245B | - |
OCPNF | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NVYTF | OCPNF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago32% | 3 days ago44% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago47% | 3 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago37% | 3 days ago48% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago52% | 3 days ago42% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago35% | 3 days ago32% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago29% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago43% | 3 days ago69% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SCHK | 31.15 | 0.12 | +0.39% |
Schwab 1000 ETF | |||
RNRG | 10.07 | N/A | -0.03% |
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF | |||
SPFF | 9.24 | N/A | -0.04% |
Global X SuperIncome™ Preferred ETF | |||
NBSD | 51.08 | -0.21 | -0.41% |
Neuberger Berman Short Duration Inc ETF | |||
IQI | 9.38 | -0.04 | -0.42% |
INVESCO QUALITY Municipal SECURITIES |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NVYTF and ARAY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVYTF and ARAY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NVYTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NVYTF | 100% | N/A | ||
ARAY - NVYTF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MBGNF - NVYTF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PRCT - NVYTF | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.08% | ||
PCHM - NVYTF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
POCI - NVYTF | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.27% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCPNF has been loosely correlated with OLYMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCPNF jumps, then OLYMY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OCPNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OCPNF | 100% | N/A | ||
OLYMY - OCPNF | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
PLLWF - OCPNF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
POCI - OCPNF | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.27% | ||
NVYTF - OCPNF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PFGTF - OCPNF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |