Ad is loading...
NWABX vs VTSAX
NWABX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs VTSAX
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$135.40
Change+$0.98 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72T
NWABX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. VTSAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.72T vs. NWABX (1.62B). VTSAX pays higher dividends than NWABX: VTSAX (1.36) vs NWABX (0.51). NWABX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: NWABX (7 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.61 vs. VTSAX (2.00). VTSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: VTSAX (3000) vs NWABX (1000000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.85 vs. NWABX (-3.80). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 87.93 vs. NWABX (40.91).
| NWABX | VTSAX | NWABX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.04 | 1,375% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.04 | 1,475% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.741 | -4.657 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 1.72T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.36 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.80 | 7.85 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.61 | 39.39 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.91 | 87.93 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 163.37 | - |