Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs VTSMX
NWABX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs VTSMX
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$158.36
Change-$0.18 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
NWABX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. VTSMX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. NWABX (1.82B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NWABX: VTSMX (1.07) vs NWABX (0.47). NWABX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NWABX (7 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.61 vs. VTSMX (2.00). VTSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: VTSMX (3000) vs NWABX (1000000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.42 vs. NWABX (5.86). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 91.58 vs. NWABX (41.65).
| NWABX | VTSMX | NWABX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.14 | 393% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.14 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.957 | 12.487 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 1.95T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.07 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.86 | 17.42 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.97 | 67.85 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.65 | 91.58 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 231.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement