Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs VTSMX
NWABX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs VTSMX
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$163.66
Change+$0.91 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
NWABX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. VTSMX commentary
Nov 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and VTSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. NWABX (1.8B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NWABX: VTSMX (1.02) vs NWABX (0.47). NWABX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NWABX (8 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.61 vs. VTSMX (2.00). VTSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: VTSMX (3000) vs NWABX (1000000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. NWABX (0.61). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 78.44 vs. NWABX (30.92).
| NWABX | VTSMX | NWABX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.14 | 393% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.14 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.489 | 15.496 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.02 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.61 | 12.26 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.08 | 69.36 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.92 | 78.44 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 220.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement