Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWADX vs RGEBX
NWADX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs RGEBX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$21.66
Change+$0.22 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.84M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.25
Change+$0.85 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.31B
NWADX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWADX (220M). NWADX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWADX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWADX (7 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NWADX (1.01). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: RGEBX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.31 vs. RGEBX (16.98). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. NWADX (36.04).
| NWADX | RGEBX | NWADX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.09 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.09 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.900 | 15.132 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.31 | 16.98 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.85 | 56.53 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.04 | 38.39 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.58 | - |