Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWADX vs RGEBX
NWADX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs RGEBX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$22.17
Change-$0.33 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.06M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.30
Change-$0.80 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
NWADX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. NWADX (231M). NWADX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWADX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWADX (7 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NWADX (1.01). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: RGEBX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.80 vs. RGEBX (12.10). NWADX return over 5 years is better than : 47.06 vs. RGEBX (43.73).
| NWADX | RGEBX | NWADX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.09 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.09 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.432 | 16.601 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.80 | 12.10 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.28 | 70.06 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.06 | 43.73 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement