Ad is loading...
NWADX vs VIGRX
NWADX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs VIGRX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$16.67
Change-$0.99 (-5.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.43M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$183.10
Change-$11.21 (-5.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.6B
NWADX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. VIGRX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. NWADX (172M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NWADX: VIGRX (0.39) vs NWADX (0.00). NWADX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NWADX (7 years) vs VIGRX (32 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). NWADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.16 vs. VIGRX (5.00). VIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: VIGRX (3000) vs NWADX (50000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.20 vs. NWADX (1.32). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 151.29 vs. NWADX (59.53).
| NWADX | VIGRX | NWADX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.17 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.17 | 594% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.829 | -8.036 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 3000 | 1,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.32 | 10.20 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.28 | 28.42 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.53 | 151.29 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 249.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...