Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWADX vs VIGRX
NWADX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs VIGRX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$21.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.4M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$238.66
Change+$0.38 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.3B
NWADX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. VIGRX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. NWADX (217M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NWADX: VIGRX (0.32) vs NWADX (0.00). NWADX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NWADX (7 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). VIGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). VIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: VIGRX (3000) vs NWADX (50000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.76 vs. NWADX (21.13). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 107.57 vs. NWADX (41.61).
| NWADX | VIGRX | NWADX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.17 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.17 | 594% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.787 | 12.774 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 3000 | 1,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 217M | 324B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.13 | 26.76 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.73 | 73.81 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.61 | 107.57 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 321.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers