Ad is loading...
NWAGX vs VFWPX
NWAGX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWAGX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas A
Price$19.88
Change-$0.55 (-2.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.11M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$124.56
Change-$2.65 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.24B
NWAGX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAGX vs. VFWPX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAGX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 59.2B vs. NWAGX (22.1M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than NWAGX: VFWPX (3.04) vs NWAGX (1.49). NWAGX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWAGX (10 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). NWAGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWAGX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.00 vs. NWAGX (2.81). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 60.57 vs. NWAGX (42.00).
| NWAGX | VFWPX | NWAGX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.03 | 3,600% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.03 | 5,067% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.800 | 6.354 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.1M | 59.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 3.04 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.81 | 5.00 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.20 | 6.78 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.00 | 60.57 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.72 | 31.21 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers