Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAGX vs VFWPX
NWAGX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWAGX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas A
Price$23.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.18M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.15
Change-$0.32 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
NWAGX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAGX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAGX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. NWAGX (24.2M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than NWAGX: VFWPX (2.68) vs NWAGX (1.00). NWAGX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWAGX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWAGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWAGX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX (17.96) and NWAGX (17.18) have marching annual gain over last year. VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 43.47 vs. NWAGX (2.47).
| NWAGX | VFWPX | NWAGX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.03 | 3,600% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.03 | 5,067% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.699 | 24.071 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2M | 71.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 2.68 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.18 | 17.96 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.41 | 49.10 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.47 | 43.47 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.50 | 72.18 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers