Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAGX vs VFWPX
NWAGX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWAGX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas A
Price$22.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.15M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$138.18
Change+$0.49 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
NWAGX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAGX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAGX is a Buy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. NWAGX (23.2M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than NWAGX: VFWPX (2.83) vs NWAGX (1.39). NWAGX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWAGX (10 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). NWAGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWAGX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.56 vs. NWAGX (7.84). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.83 vs. NWAGX (8.25).
| NWAGX | VFWPX | NWAGX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.03 | 3,600% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.03 | 5,067% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.500 | 15.116 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.2M | 65.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 2.83 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 10.56 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.38 | 23.32 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.25 | 38.83 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.52 | 43.53 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers