Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAHX vs VFWPX
NWAHX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWAHX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas R6
Price$22.30
Change-$0.24 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.12M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$137.92
Change-$1.89 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
NWAHX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAHX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAHX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. NWAHX (23.1M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than NWAHX: VFWPX (2.83) vs NWAHX (1.76). NWAHX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWAHX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWAHX (1.16) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWAHX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. NWAHX (11.47). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 44.28 vs. NWAHX (14.78).
| NWAHX | VFWPX | NWAHX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.03 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.03 | 3,867% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.530 | 15.308 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1M | 65.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 2.83 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 12.63 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.77 | 34.78 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.78 | 44.28 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.89 | 42.92 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement