Ad is loading...
NWAHX vs VFWPX
NWAHX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWAHX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas R6
Price$19.71
Change-$0.12 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.21M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$123.35
Change-$0.67 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.54B
NWAHX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAHX vs. VFWPX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAHX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 59.5B vs. NWAHX (21.2M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than NWAHX: VFWPX (3.04) vs NWAHX (1.88). NWAHX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWAHX (10 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). NWAHX (1.16) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWAHX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. NWAHX (2.73). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 42.84 vs. NWAHX (19.19).
| NWAHX | VFWPX | NWAHX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.03 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.03 | 3,867% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.640 | 3.687 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.2M | 59.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 3.04 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.73 | 6.38 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.00 | 7.92 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.19 | 42.84 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.82 | 26.34 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers