Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAHX vs VTMNX
NWAHX vs VTMNX Comparison
Open Charts NWAHX vs VTMNX
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas R6
Price$17.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.9M
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Instl
Price$19.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.77B
NWAHX vs VTMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAHX vs. VTMNX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAHX is a Hold and VTMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMNX has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. NWAHX (14.9M). VTMNX pays higher dividends than NWAHX: VTMNX (2.80) vs NWAHX (0.76). NWAHX was incepted earlier than VTMNX: NWAHX (11 years) vs VTMNX (25 years). NWAHX (1.16) is less costly to investors than VTMNX (0.03). NWAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VTMNX (3.00). NWAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMNX: NWAHX (1000000) vs VTMNX (5000000). VTMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.34 vs. NWAHX (-8.16). VTMNX return over 5 years is better than : 49.67 vs. NWAHX (-23.81).
| NWAHX | VTMNX | NWAHX / VTMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.03 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.03 | 3,867% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.798 | 27.220 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.9M | 251B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 2.80 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.16 | 18.34 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.99 | 64.18 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.81 | 49.67 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.19 | 69.59 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement