Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWALX vs RMEBX
NWALX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RMEBX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc A
Price$35.81
Change+$0.24 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets708.42M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.78
Change+$0.16 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.64B
NWALX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NWALX (708M). NWALX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NWALX (1.44) vs RMEBX (1.12). NWALX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NWALX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NWALX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). NWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RMEBX (250) vs NWALX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.09 vs. NWALX (-2.74). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 56.05 vs. NWALX (34.44).
| NWALX | RMEBX | NWALX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.07 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.07 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.160 | 9.476 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.12 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.74 | 8.09 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.07 | 31.20 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.44 | 56.05 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement