Ad is loading...
NWALX vs RMEBX
NWALX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RMEBX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc A
Price$33.46
Change+$0.14 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets603.14M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
NWALX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. NWALX (603M). NWALX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NWALX (1.59) vs RMEBX (1.21). NWALX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NWALX (5 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NWALX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). NWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RMEBX (250) vs NWALX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. NWALX (-6.00). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. NWALX (37.93).
| NWALX | RMEBX | NWALX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.07 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.07 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.912 | 1.203 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 603M | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.21 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.00 | 5.19 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.68 | 16.77 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.93 | 55.02 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.89 | - |