Ad is loading...
NWALX vs RMEBX
NWALX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RMEBX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc A
Price$32.48
Change+$1.99 (+6.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets587.71M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
NWALX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. NWALX (588M). NWALX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NWALX (1.54) vs RMEBX (1.18). NWALX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NWALX (5 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NWALX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). NWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RMEBX (250) vs NWALX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.56 vs. NWALX (-14.39). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.36 vs. NWALX (27.95).
| NWALX | RMEBX | NWALX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.07 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.07 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.659 | -7.747 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 588M | 92.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.18 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.39 | -4.56 | 316% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.29 | -1.07 | 1,237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.95 | 44.36 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...