Ad is loading...
NWALX vs RMFCX
NWALX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc A
Price$33.46
Change+$0.14 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets603.14M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
NWALX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. NWALX (603M). NWALX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWALX (1.59) vs RMFCX (1.37). NWALX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWALX (5 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). NWALX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). NWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RMFCX (250) vs NWALX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. NWALX (-6.00). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. NWALX (37.93).
| NWALX | RMFCX | NWALX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.91 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.912 | 1.270 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 603M | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.37 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.00 | 5.35 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.68 | 17.29 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.93 | 56.16 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers