Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWALX vs RMFCX
NWALX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc A
Price$37.45
Change+$0.15 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets749.54M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
NWALX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. NWALX (750M). NWALX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWALX (1.35) vs RMFCX (1.20). NWALX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWALX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). NWALX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). NWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RMFCX (250) vs NWALX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. NWALX (-3.57). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.80 vs. NWALX (35.62).
| NWALX | RMFCX | NWALX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.91 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.792 | 14.964 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 750M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.20 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.57 | 7.44 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.85 | 43.84 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.62 | 60.80 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement