Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWALX vs RMFCX
NWALX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc A
Price$35.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets708.37M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.40
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
NWALX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NWALX (708M). NWALX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWALX (1.43) vs RMFCX (1.26). NWALX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWALX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). NWALX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). NWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RMFCX (250) vs NWALX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.70 vs. NWALX (0.95). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.40 vs. NWALX (31.71).
| NWALX | RMFCX | NWALX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.91 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.251 | 9.486 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.26 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.95 | 10.70 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.60 | 25.70 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.71 | 54.40 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement