Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWALX vs RMFCX
NWALX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc A
Price$36.97
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets737.12M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
NWALX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. NWALX (737M). NWALX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWALX (1.34) vs RMFCX (1.21). NWALX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWALX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). NWALX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). NWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RMFCX (250) vs NWALX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. NWALX (-6.59). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.85 vs. NWALX (21.98).
| NWALX | RMFCX | NWALX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.91 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.785 | 12.617 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 737M | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.21 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.59 | 5.59 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.30 | 27.75 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.98 | 51.85 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers