Ad is loading...
NWALX vs RMFCX
NWALX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc A
Price$32.48
Change+$1.99 (+6.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets551.99M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.56
Change+$3.33 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
NWALX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. NWALX (552M). NWALX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWALX (1.54) vs RMFCX (1.34). NWALX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWALX (5 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). NWALX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). NWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RMFCX (250) vs NWALX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.43 vs. NWALX (-14.39). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. NWALX (27.95).
| NWALX | RMFCX | NWALX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.91 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.659 | -7.697 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 552M | 92.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.34 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.39 | -4.43 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.29 | -0.65 | 2,045% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.95 | 45.42 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...