Ad is loading...
NWALX vs RMFEX
NWALX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RMFEX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc A
Price$32.48
Change+$1.99 (+6.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets551.99M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.89
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
NWALX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. NWALX (552M). RMFEX (1.61) and NWALX (1.54) have matching dividends . NWALX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: NWALX (5 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). NWALX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). NWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RMFEX (250) vs NWALX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.11 vs. NWALX (-14.39). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 47.69 vs. NWALX (27.95).
| NWALX | RMFEX | NWALX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.62 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.659 | -7.620 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 552M | 92.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.61 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.39 | -4.11 | 350% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.29 | 0.28 | -4,806% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.95 | 47.69 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...