Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAMX vs RMFCX
NWAMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWAMX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc K
Price$36.85
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets742.59M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.45
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.34B
NWAMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAMX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. NWAMX (743M). NWAMX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWAMX (1.53) vs RMFCX (1.24). NWAMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWAMX (38 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NWAMX (0.80). NWAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAMX: RMFCX (250) vs NWAMX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.82 vs. NWAMX (-3.04). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 65.48 vs. NWAMX (42.91).
| NWAMX | RMFCX | NWAMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.654 | 13.412 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.24 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.04 | 6.82 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.04 | 39.86 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.91 | 65.48 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.59 | 100.33 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement