Ad is loading...
NWAMX vs RMFCX
NWAMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWAMX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc K
Price$33.46
Change+$0.14 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets603.14M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
NWAMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAMX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAMX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. NWAMX (603M). NWAMX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWAMX (1.75) vs RMFCX (1.37). NWAMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWAMX (37 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NWAMX (0.80). NWAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAMX: RMFCX (250) vs NWAMX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. NWAMX (-5.87). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. NWAMX (36.38).
| NWAMX | RMFCX | NWAMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.984 | 1.270 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 603M | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.37 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.87 | 5.35 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.46 | 17.29 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.38 | 56.16 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.58 | 60.33 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...