Ad is loading...
NWAMX vs RMFCX
NWAMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWAMX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc K
Price$31.93
Change-$0.30 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets583.28M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.69 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.76B
NWAMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAMX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.8B vs. NWAMX (583M). NWAMX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWAMX (1.70) vs RMFCX (1.34). NWAMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWAMX (37 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NWAMX (0.80). NWAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAMX: RMFCX (250) vs NWAMX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. NWAMX (-5.73). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. NWAMX (35.17).
| NWAMX | RMFCX | NWAMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.319 | -3.342 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 583M | 97.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.34 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.73 | 3.42 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.23 | 5.55 | -130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.17 | 48.78 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.02 | 54.35 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...