Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAPX vs RMFCX
NWAPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWAPX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc Egl
Price$37.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets740.63M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.44
Change-$0.13 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
NWAPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAPX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NWAPX (741M). NWAPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWAPX (1.63) vs RMFCX (1.24). NWAPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWAPX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NWAPX (0.80). NWAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAPX: RMFCX (250) vs NWAPX (50000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.57 vs. NWAPX (-1.46). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.88 vs. NWAPX (35.44).
| NWAPX | RMFCX | NWAPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.828 | 11.403 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 741M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.24 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.46 | 6.57 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.43 | 30.34 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.44 | 53.88 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement