Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAPX vs RMFCX
NWAPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWAPX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc Egl
Price$34.60
Change+$0.34 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets625.64M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
NWAPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAPX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. NWAPX (626M). NWAPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWAPX (1.80) vs RMFCX (1.31). NWAPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWAPX (5 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NWAPX (0.80). NWAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAPX: RMFCX (250) vs NWAPX (50000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. NWAPX (-3.13). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. NWAPX (25.86).
| NWAPX | RMFCX | NWAPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.958 | 5.919 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 626M | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.31 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.13 | 9.01 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.43 | 17.82 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.86 | 51.66 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement