Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAPX vs RMFCX
NWAPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWAPX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc Egl
Price$37.27
Change-$0.14 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets752.31M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
NWAPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAPX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. NWAPX (752M). NWAPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWAPX (1.58) vs RMFCX (1.20). NWAPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWAPX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NWAPX (0.80). NWAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAPX: RMFCX (250) vs NWAPX (50000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. NWAPX (-2.00). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. NWAPX (35.90).
| NWAPX | RMFCX | NWAPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.496 | 14.779 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 752M | 113B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.20 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.00 | 8.11 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.31 | 43.61 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.90 | 59.28 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.90 | - |