Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAPX vs RMFCX
NWAPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWAPX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc Egl
Price$35.78
Change+$0.22 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.11M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.62
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
NWAPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAPX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NWAPX (713M). NWAPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWAPX (1.68) vs RMFCX (1.26). NWAPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWAPX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NWAPX (0.80). NWAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAPX: RMFCX (250) vs NWAPX (50000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. NWAPX (0.46). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.97 vs. NWAPX (34.24).
| NWAPX | RMFCX | NWAPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.078 | 9.891 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 713M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.26 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.46 | 9.82 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.56 | 25.99 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.24 | 54.97 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement