Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAPX vs RMFCX
NWAPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWAPX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc Egl
Price$35.27
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets647.37M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.40
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.25B
NWAPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAPX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. NWAPX (647M). NWAPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWAPX (1.80) vs RMFCX (1.31). NWAPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWAPX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NWAPX (0.80). NWAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAPX: RMFCX (250) vs NWAPX (50000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.93 vs. NWAPX (0.97). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 64.23 vs. NWAPX (45.95).
| NWAPX | RMFCX | NWAPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.523 | 7.643 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 647M | 107B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.31 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.97 | 9.93 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.32 | 27.81 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.95 | 64.23 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement