NWARF
Price
$0.97
Change
+$0.01 (+1.04%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
QABSY
Price
$28.32
Change
+$0.26 (+0.93%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
57 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NWARF vs QABSY

Header iconNWARF vs QABSY Comparison
Open Charts NWARF vs QABSYBanner chart's image
Norwegian Air Shuttle Asa
Price$0.97
Change+$0.01 (+1.04%)
Volume$378
CapitalizationN/A
Qantas Airways
Price$28.32
Change+$0.26 (+0.93%)
Volume$4.77K
CapitalizationN/A
NWARF vs QABSY Comparison Chart
Loading...
NWARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QABSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWARF vs. QABSY commentary
Dec 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWARF is a StrongBuy and QABSY is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2024
Stock price -- (NWARF: $0.97 vs. QABSY: $28.32)
Brand notoriety: NWARF and QABSY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWARF: 5% vs. QABSY: 68%
Market capitalization -- NWARF: $941.9M vs. QABSY: $8.54B
NWARF [@Airlines] is valued at $941.9M. QABSY’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $8.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $40.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $6.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWARF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQABSY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NWARF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QABSY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QABSY is a better buy in the long-term than NWARF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWARF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QABSY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWARF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QABSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWARF is a better buy in the short-term than QABSY.

Price Growth

NWARF (@Airlines) experienced а -1.73% price change this week, while QABSY (@Airlines) price change was -1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

QABSY is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (+0.30% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QABSY($8.54B) has a higher market cap than NWARF($942M). QABSY has higher P/E ratio than NWARF: QABSY (12.08) vs NWARF (7.17). QABSY YTD gains are higher at: 54.558 vs. NWARF (-5.304).
NWARFQABSYNWARF / QABSY
Capitalization942M8.54B11%
EBITDA7.48BN/A-
Gain YTD-5.30454.558-10%
P/E Ratio7.1712.0859%
Revenue33BN/A-
Total Cash11.5BN/A-
Total Debt15.3BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWARF vs QABSY: Fundamental Ratings
NWARF
QABSY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2256
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
402
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
938
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWARF's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as QABSY (90). This means that NWARF’s stock grew similarly to QABSY’s over the last 12 months.

QABSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as NWARF (100). This means that QABSY’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

QABSY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWARF (40). This means that QABSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

QABSY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWARF (74). This means that QABSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

QABSY's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWARF (93). This means that QABSY’s stock grew significantly faster than NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWARFQABSY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NWARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QABSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NILIF0.280.02
+6.99%
Surge Battery Metals Inc.
MTNOY4.510.05
+1.12%
MTN Group Ltd.
LAMRX22.940.20
+0.88%
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R3
NEJYX21.010.17
+0.82%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Y
SMSEY13.920.05
+0.36%
Samsonite International SA

NWARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWARF and LUV have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWARF and LUV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWARF
1D Price
Change %
NWARF100%
+0.12%
LUV - NWARF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
ALGT - NWARF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
ICAGY - NWARF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
QABSY - NWARF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
JETMF - NWARF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
More

QABSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QABSY has been loosely correlated with SINGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QABSY jumps, then SINGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QABSY
1D Price
Change %
QABSY100%
+0.91%
SINGY - QABSY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
DLAKY - QABSY
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
ICAGY - QABSY
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
CPA - QABSY
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
JAPSY - QABSY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More