Advertisement
NWARF vs QUBSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWARF is a Hold and QUBSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NWARF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQUBSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NWARF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QUBSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NWARF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUBSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NWARF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QUBSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NWARF (@Airlines) experienced а +10.07% price change this week, while QUBSF (@Airlines) price change was +1.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.08%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Airlines (+2.35% weekly)Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.
| NWARF | QUBSF | NWARF / QUBSF | |
| Capitalization | 1.73B | 10.7B | 16% |
| EBITDA | 7.68B | 4.54B | 169% |
| Gain YTD | 70.713 | 36.092 | 196% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.20 | 10.45 | 88% |
| Revenue | 36.7B | 23.4B | 157% |
| Total Cash | 13.8B | 2.36B | 584% |
| Total Debt | 18.7B | 7.96B | 235% |
NWARF | QUBSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NWARF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as QUBSF (77). This means that NWARF’s stock grew similarly to QUBSF’s over the last 12 months.
QUBSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWARF (100). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew significantly faster than NWARF’s over the last 12 months.
QUBSF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NWARF (100). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.
NWARF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as QUBSF (47). This means that NWARF’s stock grew similarly to QUBSF’s over the last 12 months.
NWARF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QUBSF (51). This means that NWARF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QUBSF’s over the last 12 months.
| NWARF | QUBSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 43% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RING | 72.16 | 2.47 | +3.54% |
| iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | |||
| IBGA | 25.53 | 0.16 | +0.64% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Trsy ETF | |||
| EWO | 30.96 | 0.06 | +0.19% |
| iShares MSCI Austria ETF | |||
| CDX | 22.68 | -0.13 | -0.57% |
| Simplify High Yield ETF | |||
| HDLB | 15.03 | -0.69 | -4.38% |
| ETRACS Mny Py 2xLgd US Hg Dv Lw Vl ETN B | |||
NWARF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NWARF and LUV have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWARF and LUV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWARF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWARF | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| LUV - NWARF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| ALGT - NWARF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
| ICAGY - NWARF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| QABSY - NWARF | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
| JETMF - NWARF | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
More | ||||
QUBSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QUBSF and QABSY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUBSF and QABSY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUBSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUBSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| QABSY - QUBSF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
| ICAGY - QUBSF | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| NWARF - QUBSF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| JETMF - QUBSF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
| RYAOF - QUBSF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||