Ad is loading...
NWCAX vs RGABX
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGABX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$52.85
Change+$0.33 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets831.3M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$64.63
Change+$0.47 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGABX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. NWCAX (831M). NWCAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: NWCAX (16 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than NWCAX (1.08). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGABX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.96 vs. NWCAX (-6.03). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.12 vs. NWCAX (30.03).
| NWCAX | RGABX | NWCAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.39 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.030 | -2.695 | 224% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 831M | 284B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.03 | 1.96 | -308% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.82 | 29.21 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.03 | 36.12 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.97 | 48.37 | 35% |