Ad is loading...
NWCAX vs RGABX
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGABX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$57.26
Change+$0.05 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.08M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$70.08
Change+$0.62 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.75B
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGABX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a StrongBuy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. NWCAX (942M). NWCAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: NWCAX (16 years) vs RGABX (23 years). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGABX (31.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGABX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.72 vs. NWCAX (10.09). RGABX (44.67) and NWCAX (43.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWCAX | RGABX | NWCAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.451 | 5.510 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 310B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.09 | 20.72 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.46 | 14.03 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.83 | 44.67 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.07 | 70.55 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers