Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGABX
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGABX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$60.46
Change-$0.83 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets875.06M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.68
Change-$0.71 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWCAX (875M). NWCAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: NWCAX (16 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than NWCAX (1.08). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGABX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.64 vs. NWCAX (1.66). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 28.84 vs. NWCAX (17.03).
| NWCAX | RGABX | NWCAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.39 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.177 | 13.942 | 59% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 875M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.66 | 12.64 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.57 | 49.33 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.03 | 28.84 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.29 | 86.91 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement