Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGABX
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGABX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$56.93
Change-$0.13 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets890.32M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$69.17
Change-$0.23 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. NWCAX (890M). NWCAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: NWCAX (16 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than NWCAX (1.08). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGABX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.87 vs. NWCAX (-2.14). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.03 vs. NWCAX (32.98).
| NWCAX | RGABX | NWCAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.39 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.093 | 4.487 | 47% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 890M | 305B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | 6.87 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.87 | 32.75 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.98 | 36.03 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.08 | 60.17 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers