Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAFX
NWCAX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAFX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$60.46
Change-$0.83 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets875.06M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$85.38
Change-$0.79 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
NWCAX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWCAX (875M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAFX (0.55) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NWCAX (16 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAFX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.87 vs. NWCAX (1.66). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.21 vs. NWCAX (17.03).
| NWCAX | RGAFX | NWCAX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.34 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.34 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.177 | 14.727 | 56% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 875M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.66 | 14.87 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.57 | 56.09 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.03 | 38.21 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.29 | 106.06 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement