Ad is loading...
NWCAX vs RGEBX
NWCAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGEBX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$65.34
Change+$0.46 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$78.79
Change-$0.29 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NWCAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 13, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. NWCAX (1B). RGEBX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGEBX (0.16) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWCAX (16 years) vs RGEBX (10 years). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (31.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGEBX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). NWCAX (34.77) and RGEBX (34.45) have marching annual gain over last year. NWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.55 vs. RGEBX (56.75).
| NWCAX | RGEBX | NWCAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.307 | 29.938 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 307B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.77 | 34.45 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.11 | -2.43 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.55 | 56.75 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.42 | 69.52 | 51% |