Ad is loading...
NWCAX vs RGEBX
NWCAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGEBX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$61.11
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$73.82
Change-$0.14 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NWCAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Buy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 290B vs. NWCAX (966M). RGEBX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGEBX (0.16) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWCAX (15 years) vs RGEBX (10 years). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RGEBX (31.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGEBX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). NWCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.56 vs. RGEBX (22.86). NWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.23 vs. RGEBX (47.60).
| NWCAX | RGEBX | NWCAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.064 | 18.896 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 966M | 290B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.56 | 22.86 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.89 | -4.80 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.23 | 47.60 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.56 | 56.25 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...