Ad is loading...
NWCCX vs RGAGX
NWCCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$35.12
Change+$0.63 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets760.07M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$67.32
Change+$1.06 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.04B
NWCCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Apr 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. NWCCX (760M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGAGX (0.71) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCCX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.89 vs. NWCCX (-18.95). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.17 vs. NWCCX (14.58).
| NWCCX | RGAGX | NWCCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.30 | 610% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.241 | -9.698 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 760M | 265B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.95 | -4.89 | 387% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.32 | 7.71 | -121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.58 | 49.17 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.38 | 52.69 | -35% |