Ad is loading...
NWCCX vs RGAGX
NWCCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$40.21
Change+$0.56 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets865.58M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$76.45
Change+$0.95 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.3B
NWCCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGAGX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 296B vs. NWCCX (866M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGAGX (0.70) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCCX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. NWCCX (-7.16). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. NWCCX (17.34).
| NWCCX | RGAGX | NWCCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.30 | 610% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.050 | 2.549 | -80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 866M | 296B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | 9.03 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.41 | 38.66 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.34 | 56.16 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.28 | 70.59 | -12% |