Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGAEX
NWCFX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGAEX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$67.89
Change+$0.42 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets875.06M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R4
Price$84.30
Change+$0.57 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
NWCFX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGAEX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWCFX (875M). RGAEX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGAEX (0.31) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGAEX (23 years). NWCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.64). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAEX (25.00). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGAEX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. NWCFX (1.92). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 37.45 vs. NWCFX (23.71).
| NWCFX | RGAEX | NWCFX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.64 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.64 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.745 | 14.663 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 875M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.92 | 14.08 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.58 | 52.34 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.71 | 37.45 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.50 | 95.95 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement