Ad is loading...
NWCFX vs RGAEX
NWCFX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGAEX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$53.34
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.4M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R4
Price$65.37
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
NWCFX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGAEX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. NWCFX (755M). RGAEX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGAEX (0.37) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGAEX (23 years). NWCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.64). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAEX (25.00). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGAEX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.93 vs. NWCFX (-11.07). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. NWCFX (31.01).
| NWCFX | RGAEX | NWCFX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.64 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.64 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.915 | -11.085 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 755M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.07 | -2.93 | 377% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.52 | 5.14 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.01 | 37.02 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.40 | 47.43 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers