Ad is loading...
NWCFX vs VIGRX
NWCFX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs VIGRX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$59.25
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets833.27M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$199.63
Change-$0.02 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.26B
NWCFX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. VIGRX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and VIGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. NWCFX (833M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: VIGRX (0.38) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NWCFX (12 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). NWCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). VIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: VIGRX (3000) vs NWCFX (1000000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. NWCFX (-4.13). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 109.53 vs. NWCFX (38.21).
| NWCFX | VIGRX | NWCFX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.17 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.17 | 406% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.382 | -5.518 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 833M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.13 | 12.82 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.18 | 63.98 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.21 | 109.53 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.58 | 259.25 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...