It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NWGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUBNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NWGL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUBNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NWGL (@Forest Products) experienced а +5.20% price change this week, while RUBNF (@Forest Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.07%.
Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).
NWGL | RUBNF | NWGL / RUBNF | |
Capitalization | 247M | 59.9M | 412% |
EBITDA | N/A | 37M | - |
Gain YTD | -83.563 | -33.333 | 251% |
P/E Ratio | 29.85 | 196.08 | 15% |
Revenue | N/A | 74.7M | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 8.88M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 56.6M | - |
RUBNF | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NWGL | RUBNF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago48% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago39% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago32% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago28% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago86% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago90% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NWGL and WFSTF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWGL and WFSTF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NWGL | 100% | -1.87% | ||
WFSTF - NWGL | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WFG - NWGL | 8% Poorly correlated | -3.47% | ||
RUBNF - NWGL | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SVCBF - NWGL | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IFSPF - NWGL | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.64% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RUBNF and NWGL have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUBNF and NWGL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUBNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RUBNF | 100% | N/A | ||
NWGL - RUBNF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
IFSPF - RUBNF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.64% | ||
TCOR - RUBNF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WFG - RUBNF | -0% Poorly correlated | -3.47% | ||
STLJF - RUBNF | -0% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
More |