Ad is loading...
NWHGX vs SSGSX
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHGX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val R6
Price$13.53
Change-$0.90 (-6.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.67M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.36
Change-$3.24 (-7.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.88B
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHGX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHGX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. NWHGX (97.7M). NWHGX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHGX (1.91) vs SSGSX (0.52). NWHGX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHGX (12 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHGX (0.93). NWHGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHGX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHGX (1000000). NWHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.38 vs. SSGSX (-9.24). NWHGX return over 5 years is better than : 116.64 vs. SSGSX (51.13).
| NWHGX | SSGSX | NWHGX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.686 | -6.095 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 5.88B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 0.52 | 371% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.38 | -9.24 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.50 | -10.59 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.64 | 51.13 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.56 | 10.74 | 238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers