Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHGX vs SSGSX
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHGX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val R6
Price$16.14
Change-$0.20 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.54
Change-$0.45 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHGX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHGX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. NWHGX (111M). NWHGX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHGX (1.10) vs SSGSX (0.48). NWHGX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHGX (12 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHGX (0.93). NWHGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHGX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHGX (1000000). NWHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.95 vs. SSGSX (-3.68). NWHGX return over 5 years is better than : 65.70 vs. SSGSX (20.58).
| NWHGX | SSGSX | NWHGX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.797 | 1.206 | 564% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 5.49B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.48 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.95 | -3.68 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.31 | 7.50 | 378% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.70 | 20.58 | 319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.47 | 20.51 | 251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers