Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHGX vs SSGSX
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHGX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val R6
Price$14.73
Change-$0.23 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.31M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.57
Change-$0.76 (-1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHGX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHGX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. NWHGX (99.3M). NWHGX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHGX (1.66) vs SSGSX (0.50). NWHGX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHGX (12 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHGX (0.93). NWHGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHGX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHGX (1000000). NWHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.75 vs. SSGSX (-11.81). NWHGX return over 5 years is better than : 62.76 vs. SSGSX (19.01).
| NWHGX | SSGSX | NWHGX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.725 | -6.160 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 5.31B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.50 | 332% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.75 | -11.81 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.79 | -8.63 | -56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.76 | 19.01 | 330% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.66 | 12.36 | 297% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers