Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHGX vs SSGSX
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHGX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val R6
Price$16.13
Change+$0.44 (+2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.76M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.24
Change+$1.28 (+2.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.03B
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHGX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHGX is a Buy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.03B vs. NWHGX (109M). NWHGX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHGX (1.11) vs SSGSX (0.49). NWHGX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHGX (12 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHGX (0.93). NWHGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHGX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHGX (1000000). NWHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.88 vs. SSGSX (-13.99). NWHGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.86 vs. SSGSX (4.30).
| NWHGX | SSGSX | NWHGX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.425 | -2.563 | -212% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 5.03B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.49 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.88 | -13.99 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.38 | -9.73 | -127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.86 | 4.30 | 1,089% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.02 | 13.37 | 329% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers