Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHJX vs VFWPX
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHJX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs A
Price$11.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.31M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$140.86
Change+$0.20 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHJX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHJX is a Buy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. NWHJX (235M). NWHJX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: NWHJX (3.11) vs VFWPX (2.76). NWHJX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHJX (19 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWHJX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHJX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHJX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). NWHJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.96 vs. VFWPX (12.63). NWHJX return over 5 years is better than : 71.28 vs. VFWPX (41.51).
| NWHJX | VFWPX | NWHJX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.826 | 17.798 | 123% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 68B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 2.76 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.96 | 12.63 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.57 | 41.37 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.28 | 41.51 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.43 | 48.38 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement