Ad is loading...
NWHJX vs VFWPX
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHJX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs A
Price$10.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.99M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$127.21
Change+$0.36 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.24B
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHJX vs. VFWPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHJX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 59.2B vs. NWHJX (212M). NWHJX (3.18) and VFWPX (3.04) have matching dividends . NWHJX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHJX (19 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). NWHJX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHJX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHJX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). NWHJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.09 vs. VFWPX (5.20). NWHJX return over 5 years is better than : 93.35 vs. VFWPX (60.12).
| NWHJX | VFWPX | NWHJX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.793 | 6.053 | 162% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 59.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 3.04 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.09 | 5.20 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.03 | 7.31 | 370% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.35 | 60.12 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.80 | 32.15 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...