Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHJX vs VFWPX
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHJX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs A
Price$11.55
Change-$0.04 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.41M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.50
Change-$0.42 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHJX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHJX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. NWHJX (257M). NWHJX (2.79) and VFWPX (2.70) have matching dividends . NWHJX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHJX (20 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWHJX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHJX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHJX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). NWHJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.31 vs. VFWPX (21.62). NWHJX return over 5 years is better than : 60.79 vs. VFWPX (33.14).
| NWHJX | VFWPX | NWHJX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.209 | 24.879 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 257M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.70 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.31 | 21.62 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.73 | 45.59 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.79 | 33.14 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.58 | 69.04 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers