Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHJX vs VFWPX
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHJX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs A
Price$11.34
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.8M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$145.32
Change+$0.81 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHJX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHJX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. NWHJX (246M). NWHJX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: NWHJX (3.05) vs VFWPX (2.68). NWHJX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHJX (19 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWHJX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHJX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHJX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). NWHJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.32 vs. VFWPX (15.31). NWHJX return over 5 years is better than : 68.75 vs. VFWPX (40.10).
| NWHJX | VFWPX | NWHJX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.247 | 21.023 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246M | 71.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 2.68 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.32 | 15.31 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.42 | 47.08 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.75 | 40.10 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.00 | 68.81 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement