Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHJX vs VFWPX
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHJX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs A
Price$11.09
Change+$0.10 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.99M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.45
Change+$1.23 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHJX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHJX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. NWHJX (238M). NWHJX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: NWHJX (3.18) vs VFWPX (2.79). NWHJX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHJX (19 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWHJX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHJX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHJX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). NWHJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.55 vs. VFWPX (19.68). NWHJX return over 5 years is better than : 66.22 vs. VFWPX (38.81).
| NWHJX | VFWPX | NWHJX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.946 | 18.267 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 68.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 2.79 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.55 | 19.68 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.72 | 35.13 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.22 | 38.81 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.06 | 49.21 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement