Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHJX vs VFWPX
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHJX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs A
Price$11.03
Change+$0.04 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.43M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$138.18
Change+$0.49 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHJX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHJX is a Buy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. NWHJX (231M). NWHJX (2.93) and VFWPX (2.83) have matching dividends . NWHJX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHJX (19 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). NWHJX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHJX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHJX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). NWHJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.82 vs. VFWPX (10.56). NWHJX return over 5 years is better than : 69.51 vs. VFWPX (38.83).
| NWHJX | VFWPX | NWHJX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.587 | 15.116 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 65.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.83 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.82 | 10.56 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.97 | 23.32 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.51 | 38.83 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.95 | 43.53 | 149% |