Ad is loading...
NWHMX vs VFWPX
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHMX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs R6
Price$9.34
Change-$0.61 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.27M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$117.43
Change-$7.13 (-5.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.24B
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHMX vs. VFWPX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHMX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 59.2B vs. NWHMX (208M). NWHMX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: NWHMX (3.41) vs VFWPX (3.04). NWHMX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHMX (12 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). NWHMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHMX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). NWHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.75 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHMX return over 5 years is better than : 96.91 vs. VFWPX (60.57).
| NWHMX | VFWPX | NWHMX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.996 | 6.354 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 208M | 59.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.04 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.75 | 5.00 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.00 | 6.78 | 413% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.91 | 60.57 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.95 | 31.21 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers