Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHMX vs VFWPX
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHMX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs R6
Price$11.17
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.33M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.93
Change-$0.24 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHMX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHMX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. NWHMX (241M). NWHMX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: NWHMX (3.32) vs VFWPX (2.76). NWHMX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHMX (12 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWHMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHMX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). NWHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.46 vs. VFWPX (17.82). NWHMX return over 5 years is better than : 73.15 vs. VFWPX (42.45).
| NWHMX | VFWPX | NWHMX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.956 | 19.900 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 241M | 68B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.32 | 2.76 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.46 | 17.82 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.24 | 40.91 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.15 | 42.45 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.39 | 53.89 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement