Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHMX vs VFWPX
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHMX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs R6
Price$10.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.85M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$135.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.12B
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHMX vs. VFWPX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHMX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 62.1B vs. NWHMX (229M). NWHMX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: NWHMX (3.30) vs VFWPX (2.95). NWHMX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHMX (12 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). NWHMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHMX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). NWHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.17 vs. VFWPX (8.99). NWHMX return over 5 years is better than : 88.60 vs. VFWPX (53.72).
| NWHMX | VFWPX | NWHMX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.566 | 13.703 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 62.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.30 | 2.95 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.17 | 8.99 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.75 | 26.37 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.60 | 53.72 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.55 | 35.69 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement