Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHMX vs VFWPX
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHMX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs R6
Price$11.40
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.59M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$144.97
Change+$0.55 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHMX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHMX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. NWHMX (247M). NWHMX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: NWHMX (3.39) vs VFWPX (2.79). NWHMX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHMX (12 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWHMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHMX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). NWHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.34 vs. VFWPX (16.96). NWHMX return over 5 years is better than : 71.67 vs. VFWPX (40.41).
| NWHMX | VFWPX | NWHMX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.151 | 21.408 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 68.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.39 | 2.79 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.34 | 16.96 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.97 | 36.09 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.67 | 40.41 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.58 | 58.38 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement