Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHMX vs VFWPX
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHMX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs R6
Price$10.83
Change-$0.16 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.58M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$137.92
Change-$1.89 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHMX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHMX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. NWHMX (229M). NWHMX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: NWHMX (3.15) vs VFWPX (2.83). NWHMX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHMX (12 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWHMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHMX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). NWHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.84 vs. VFWPX (12.63). NWHMX return over 5 years is better than : 76.87 vs. VFWPX (44.28).
| NWHMX | VFWPX | NWHMX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.894 | 15.308 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 65.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 2.83 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.84 | 12.63 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.68 | 34.78 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.87 | 44.28 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.62 | 42.92 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers