NWRLY
Price
$0.79
Change
+$0.07 (+9.72%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
64.44M
WLWHY
Price
$2.70
Change
-$0.20 (-6.90%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.58B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWRLY vs WLWHY

Header iconNWRLY vs WLWHY Comparison
Open Charts NWRLY vs WLWHYBanner chart's image
New World Department Store China
Price$0.79
Change+$0.07 (+9.72%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization64.44M
Woolworths Holdings
Price$2.70
Change-$0.20 (-6.90%)
Volume$360
Capitalization2.58B
NWRLY vs WLWHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WLWHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWRLY vs. WLWHY commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWRLY is a Buy and WLWHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (NWRLY: $0.79 vs. WLWHY: $2.70)
Brand notoriety: NWRLY and WLWHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWRLY: 100% vs. WLWHY: 57%
Market capitalization -- NWRLY: $64.44M vs. WLWHY: $2.58B
NWRLY [@Department Stores] is valued at $64.44M. WLWHY’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $2.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $5.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWRLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLWHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NWRLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLWHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NWRLY and WLWHY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WLWHY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WLWHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

NWRLY (@Department Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLWHY (@Department Stores) price change was -7.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (-2.19% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLWHY($2.58B) has a higher market cap than NWRLY($64.4M). NWRLY has higher P/E ratio than WLWHY: NWRLY (27.56) vs WLWHY (14.35). NWRLY YTD gains are higher at: 10.209 vs. WLWHY (-20.236).
NWRLYWLWHYNWRLY / WLWHY
Capitalization64.4M2.58B2%
EBITDAN/A5.6B-
Gain YTD10.209-20.236-50%
P/E Ratio27.5614.35192%
RevenueN/A78.6B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWRLY vs WLWHY: Fundamental Ratings
NWRLY
WLWHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3887
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
8999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5379
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5061
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
39n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLWHY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWRLY (51). This means that WLWHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWRLY’s over the last 12 months.

WLWHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWRLY (100). This means that WLWHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWRLY’s over the last 12 months.

NWRLY's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as WLWHY (99). This means that NWRLY’s stock grew similarly to WLWHY’s over the last 12 months.

NWRLY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as WLWHY (79). This means that NWRLY’s stock grew similarly to WLWHY’s over the last 12 months.

NWRLY's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as WLWHY (61). This means that NWRLY’s stock grew similarly to WLWHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWRLYWLWHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WLWHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRLGX92.14N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Gr I
MWOIX67.39N/A
N/A
MFS Global Growth I
FMIFX23.85N/A
N/A
FMI International II Ccy UnH Ins
BRSUX14.82-0.10
-0.67%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R4
NDVBX16.03-0.18
-1.11%
MFS New Discovery Value B

NWRLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWRLY and WLWHY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWRLY and WLWHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWRLY
1D Price
Change %
NWRLY100%
N/A
WLWHY - NWRLY
7%
Poorly correlated
-7.03%
RYKKF - NWRLY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYKKY - NWRLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SURRY - NWRLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAKSY - NWRLY
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
More

WLWHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLWHY and SRGHY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLWHY and SRGHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLWHY
1D Price
Change %
WLWHY100%
-7.03%
SRGHY - WLWHY
18%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
NWRLY - WLWHY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOKUY - WLWHY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYKKY - WLWHY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYKKF - WLWHY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More