NWWCF
Price
$5.63
Change
-$0.27 (-4.58%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
24.05B
PIAIF
Price
$6.50
Change
-$0.25 (-3.70%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
133.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWWCF vs PIAIF

Header iconNWWCF vs PIAIF Comparison
Open Charts NWWCF vs PIAIFBanner chart's image
New China Life Ins
Price$5.63
Change-$0.27 (-4.58%)
Volume$2.02K
Capitalization24.05B
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China
Price$6.50
Change-$0.25 (-3.70%)
Volume$2.12K
Capitalization133.42B
NWWCF vs PIAIF Comparison Chart in %
NWWCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIAIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWWCF vs. PIAIF commentary
Oct 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWWCF is a Hold and PIAIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2025
Stock price -- (NWWCF: $5.63 vs. PIAIF: $6.50)
Brand notoriety: NWWCF and PIAIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWWCF: 119% vs. PIAIF: 70%
Market capitalization -- NWWCF: $24.05B vs. PIAIF: $133.42B
NWWCF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $24.05B. PIAIF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $133.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $137.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWWCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePIAIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NWWCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PIAIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NWWCF and PIAIF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWWCF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIAIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWWCF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PIAIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWWCF is a better buy in the short-term than PIAIF.

Price Growth

NWWCF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PIAIF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -9.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.83% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIAIF($133B) has a higher market cap than NWWCF($24B). PIAIF has higher P/E ratio than NWWCF: PIAIF (7.03) vs NWWCF (4.18). NWWCF YTD gains are higher at: 181.078 vs. PIAIF (19.266). PIAIF has more cash in the bank: 974B vs. NWWCF (32.6B). NWWCF has less debt than PIAIF: NWWCF (20.9B) vs PIAIF (1.34T). PIAIF has higher revenues than NWWCF: PIAIF (738B) vs NWWCF (142B).
NWWCFPIAIFNWWCF / PIAIF
Capitalization24B133B18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD181.07819.266940%
P/E Ratio4.187.0359%
Revenue142B738B19%
Total Cash32.6B974B3%
Total Debt20.9B1.34T2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PIAIF: Fundamental Ratings
PIAIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
51
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWWCFPIAIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWWCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIAIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STG.X0.1975630.009324
+4.95%
Stargate Finance cryptocurrency
AGIX.X0.2607080.006572
+2.59%
SingularityNET cryptocurrency
AUCTION.X8.7714770.142695
+1.65%
Bounce Token cryptocurrency
XTZ.X0.7116960.009411
+1.34%
Tezos cryptocurrency
ALPHA.X0.015351-0.000141
-0.91%
Stella cryptocurrency

NWWCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWWCF and PIAIF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWWCF and PIAIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWWCF
1D Price
Change %
NWWCF100%
N/A
PIAIF - NWWCF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLFG - NWWCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLIF - NWWCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
ELFIF - NWWCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
DCYHY - NWWCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PIAIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIAIF has been loosely correlated with PNGAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIAIF jumps, then PNGAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIAIF
1D Price
Change %
PIAIF100%
N/A
PNGAY - PIAIF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
AAIGF - PIAIF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.12%
AAGIY - PIAIF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
CILJF - PIAIF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUKPF - PIAIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More