Ad is loading...
NWZLX vs RGACX
NWZLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWZLX vs RGACX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$17.56
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
NWZLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZLX vs. RGACX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZLX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. NWZLX (177M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: RGACX (0.08) vs NWZLX (0.00). NWZLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWZLX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: RGACX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). NWZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. RGACX (2.58). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.87 vs. NWZLX (35.49).
| NWZLX | RGACX | NWZLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.94 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.337 | -2.667 | 200% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 285B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | 2.58 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.71 | 31.70 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.49 | 41.87 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...