Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZLX vs RGACX
NWZLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWZLX vs RGACX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$21.98
Change+$0.21 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.61M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.09
Change+$0.64 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
NWZLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZLX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZLX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. NWZLX (231M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWZLX (0.00). NWZLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWZLX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: RGACX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). NWZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.98 vs. RGACX (14.19). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.04 vs. NWZLX (36.49).
| NWZLX | RGACX | NWZLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.94 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.358 | 19.586 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.98 | 14.19 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.71 | 74.27 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.49 | 40.04 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement