Ad is loading...
NWZLX vs RGAEX
NWZLX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts NWZLX vs RGAEX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$17.56
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R4
Price$71.64
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
NWZLX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZLX vs. RGAEX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZLX is a StrongBuy and RGAEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. NWZLX (177M). RGAEX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: RGAEX (0.36) vs NWZLX (0.00). NWZLX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: NWZLX (8 years) vs RGAEX (23 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.64). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: RGAEX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). NWZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. RGAEX (3.07). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 44.08 vs. NWZLX (35.49).
| NWZLX | RGAEX | NWZLX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.64 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.64 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.337 | -2.557 | 209% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 285B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | 3.07 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.71 | 32.98 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.49 | 44.08 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...