Ad is loading...
NWZLX vs VIGRX
NWZLX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NWZLX vs VIGRX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$16.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.5M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$191.56
Change-$0.44 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.6B
NWZLX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZLX vs. VIGRX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZLX is a Hold and VIGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. NWZLX (171M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: VIGRX (0.35) vs NWZLX (0.00). NWZLX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NWZLX (8 years) vs VIGRX (32 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). NWZLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.16 vs. VIGRX (5.00). NWZLX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: NWZLX (2000) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. NWZLX (-0.24). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 149.70 vs. NWZLX (58.26).
| NWZLX | VIGRX | NWZLX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.17 | 747% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.17 | 800% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.650 | -9.130 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.24 | 10.52 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.20 | 44.12 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.26 | 149.70 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 250.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...