Ad is loading...
NWZLX vs VIGRX
NWZLX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NWZLX vs VIGRX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$16.67
Change+$0.47 (+2.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.47M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$191.08
Change+$5.47 (+2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.76B
NWZLX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZLX vs. VIGRX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZLX is a StrongBuy and VIGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. NWZLX (163M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: VIGRX (0.39) vs NWZLX (0.00). NWZLX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NWZLX (8 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). NWZLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.16 vs. VIGRX (5.00). NWZLX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: NWZLX (2000) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.89 vs. NWZLX (0.87). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 105.69 vs. NWZLX (29.50).
| NWZLX | VIGRX | NWZLX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.17 | 747% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.17 | 800% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.668 | -12.154 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.87 | 8.89 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.30 | 37.20 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.50 | 105.69 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 230.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...