Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZMX vs RGEBX
NWZMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs RGEBX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$21.47
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.38M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.38
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
NWZMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. NWZMX (214M). NWZMX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWZMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWZMX (8 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NWZMX (0.91). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZMX (8.16). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: RGEBX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.15 vs. NWZMX (2.87). NWZMX (32.37) and RGEBX (30.81) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWZMX | RGEBX | NWZMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.09 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.417 | 15.314 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.87 | 6.15 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.15 | 60.18 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.37 | 30.81 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement