Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZMX vs RGEBX
NWZMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs RGEBX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$21.83
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.22M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
NWZMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NWZMX (218M). NWZMX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWZMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWZMX (8 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NWZMX (0.91). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZMX (8.16). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: RGEBX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). NWZMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. RGEBX (13.85). NWZMX return over 5 years is better than : 42.96 vs. RGEBX (40.64).
| NWZMX | RGEBX | NWZMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.09 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.285 | 13.942 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.84 | 13.85 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | 40.38 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.96 | 40.64 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.50 | - |