Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZMX vs RGEBX
NWZMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs RGEBX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$21.82
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets222.47M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.44
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NWZMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NWZMX (222M). NWZMX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWZMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWZMX (8 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NWZMX (0.91). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZMX (8.16). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: RGEBX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). NWZMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.55 vs. RGEBX (17.59). RGEBX (38.71) and NWZMX (38.45) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWZMX | RGEBX | NWZMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.09 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.233 | 15.398 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 222M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.55 | 17.59 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.07 | 57.61 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.45 | 38.71 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement