Ad is loading...
NWZMX vs VIGRX
NWZMX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs VIGRX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$16.77
Change-$1.00 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.43M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$183.10
Change-$11.21 (-5.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.6B
NWZMX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. VIGRX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. NWZMX (172M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: VIGRX (0.39) vs NWZMX (0.00). NWZMX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NWZMX (8 years) vs VIGRX (32 years). NWZMX (0.91) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). NWZMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.16 vs. VIGRX (5.00). VIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: VIGRX (3000) vs NWZMX (1000000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.20 vs. NWZMX (1.48). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 151.29 vs. NWZMX (60.52).
| NWZMX | VIGRX | NWZMX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.17 | 482% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.17 | 535% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.784 | -8.036 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.48 | 10.20 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.75 | 28.42 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.52 | 151.29 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 249.99 | - |