NXDCF
Price
$9.18
Change
+$0.27 (+3.03%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.84B
SPSAF
Price
$221.00
Change
+$14.95 (+7.26%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NXDCF vs SPSAF

Header iconNXDCF vs SPSAF Comparison
Open Charts NXDCF vs SPSAFBanner chart's image
NEXTDC Ltd, Brisbane QLD
Price$9.18
Change+$0.27 (+3.03%)
Volume$149
Capitalization5.84B
SOPRA SA
Price$221.00
Change+$14.95 (+7.26%)
Volume$14
Capitalization4.55B
NXDCF vs SPSAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NXDCF vs. SPSAF commentary
Jun 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NXDCF is a Hold and SPSAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2025
Stock price -- (NXDCF: $9.18 vs. SPSAF: $221.00)
Brand notoriety: NXDCF and SPSAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NXDCF: 29% vs. SPSAF: 154%
Market capitalization -- NXDCF: $5.84B vs. SPSAF: $4.55B
NXDCF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $5.84B. SPSAF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $4.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $261.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NXDCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSPSAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NXDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SPSAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPSAF is a better buy in the long-term than NXDCF.

Price Growth

NXDCF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +3.08% price change this week, while SPSAF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-2.08% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NXDCF($5.84B) has a higher market cap than SPSAF($4.55B). SPSAF YTD gains are higher at: 28.272 vs. NXDCF (-8.705). SPSAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 737M vs. NXDCF (218M). NXDCF has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. SPSAF (423M). SPSAF has less debt than NXDCF: SPSAF (1.23B) vs NXDCF (1.46B). SPSAF has higher revenues than NXDCF: SPSAF (5.78B) vs NXDCF (404M).
NXDCFSPSAFNXDCF / SPSAF
Capitalization5.84B4.55B128%
EBITDA218M737M30%
Gain YTD-8.70528.272-31%
P/E RatioN/A12.61-
Revenue404M5.78B7%
Total Cash1.24B423M292%
Total Debt1.46B1.23B118%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPSAF: Fundamental Ratings
SPSAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
45
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25
SMR RATING
1..100
84
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCVCX23.22N/A
N/A
JHancock Classic Value C
FCASX28.47N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
BDFFX32.95N/A
N/A
Baron Discovery Retail
LSOFX18.37N/A
N/A
LS Opportunity Fund Institutional Class
WCMWX17.08N/A
N/A
WCM Focused Emerging Mkts Ex Chn Inst

NXDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NXDCF and POSAF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NXDCF and POSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NXDCF
1D Price
Change %
NXDCF100%
N/A
POSAF - NXDCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.71%
NRILY - NXDCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
NOSUF - NXDCF
0%
Poorly correlated
-36.12%
SPSAF - NXDCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTTDF - NXDCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SPSAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPSAF and POSAF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPSAF and POSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPSAF
1D Price
Change %
SPSAF100%
N/A
POSAF - SPSAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+10.71%
NRILY - SPSAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
NXDCF - SPSAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTTDF - SPSAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOSUF - SPSAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-36.12%
More