Advertisement
NXDCF vs SPSAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NXDCF is a Hold and SPSAF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NXDCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSPSAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- NXDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SPSAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NXDCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPSAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NXDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SPSAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
NXDCF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -2.97% price change this week, while SPSAF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.96%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (-1.57% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| NXDCF | SPSAF | NXDCF / SPSAF | |
| Capitalization | 6.09B | 4.11B | 148% |
| EBITDA | 218M | 737M | 30% |
| Gain YTD | -12.326 | 28.272 | -44% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.54 | - |
| Revenue | 404M | 5.78B | 7% |
| Total Cash | 1.24B | 423M | 292% |
| Total Debt | 1.46B | 1.23B | 118% |
NXDCF | SPSAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SPSAF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NXDCF (93). This means that SPSAF’s stock grew significantly faster than NXDCF’s over the last 12 months.
SPSAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as NXDCF (46). This means that SPSAF’s stock grew similarly to NXDCF’s over the last 12 months.
SPSAF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as NXDCF (94). This means that SPSAF’s stock grew similarly to NXDCF’s over the last 12 months.
SPSAF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as NXDCF (78). This means that SPSAF’s stock grew similarly to NXDCF’s over the last 12 months.
NXDCF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SPSAF (86). This means that NXDCF’s stock grew similarly to SPSAF’s over the last 12 months.
| NXDCF | SPSAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 13% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 13% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 22% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KEMX | 32.36 | 0.19 | +0.58% |
| KraneShares MSCI Em Mkts ex CHN ETF | |||
| GEM | 37.68 | 0.16 | +0.42% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® EMkts Eq ETF | |||
| GGLS | 11.23 | 0.02 | +0.19% |
| Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X ETF | |||
| IMTB | 43.59 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | |||
| GUMI | 50.22 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| Goldman Sachs Ultra Shrt Muncpl Inc ETF | |||
NXDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NXDCF and POSAF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NXDCF and POSAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NXDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NXDCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| POSAF - NXDCF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NRILY - NXDCF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| NOSUF - NXDCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SPSAF - NXDCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NTTDF - NXDCF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SPSAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPSAF and POSAF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPSAF and POSAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPSAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPSAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| POSAF - SPSAF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NRILY - SPSAF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| NXDCF - SPSAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NTTDF - SPSAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NOSUF - SPSAF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||