NXFNF
Price
$5.00
Change
-$0.34 (-6.37%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
PUBGY
Price
$26.84
Change
-$0.64 (-2.33%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
49 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NXFNF vs PUBGY

Header iconNXFNF vs PUBGY Comparison
Open Charts NXFNF vs PUBGYBanner chart's image
NEXT 15 GROUP
Price$5.00
Change-$0.34 (-6.37%)
Volume$124
CapitalizationN/A
Publicis Groupe S.A
Price$26.84
Change-$0.64 (-2.33%)
Volume$63.95K
CapitalizationN/A
NXFNF vs PUBGY Comparison Chart
Loading...
NXFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUBGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NXFNF vs. PUBGY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NXFNF is a Hold and PUBGY is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (NXFNF: $5.00 vs. PUBGY: $26.84)
Brand notoriety: NXFNF and PUBGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Advertising/Marketing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NXFNF: 10% vs. PUBGY: 102%
Market capitalization -- NXFNF: $747.54M vs. PUBGY: $20.27B
NXFNF [@Advertising/Marketing Services] is valued at $747.54M. PUBGY’s [@Advertising/Marketing Services] market capitalization is $20.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry ranges from $20.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry is $2.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NXFNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePUBGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NXFNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PUBGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PUBGY is a better buy in the long-term than NXFNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NXFNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUBGY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NXFNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PUBGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PUBGY is a better buy in the short-term than NXFNF.

Price Growth

NXFNF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PUBGY (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was -4.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

PUBGY is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Advertising/Marketing Services (-2.14% weekly)

Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUBGY($20.3B) has a higher market cap than NXFNF($748M). PUBGY YTD gains are higher at: 23.995 vs. NXFNF (-51.220). PUBGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.77B vs. NXFNF (-39.7M). PUBGY has more cash in the bank: 3.68B vs. NXFNF (29M). NXFNF has less debt than PUBGY: NXFNF (96.6M) vs PUBGY (6.19B). PUBGY has higher revenues than NXFNF: PUBGY (14.8B) vs NXFNF (603M).
NXFNFPUBGYNXFNF / PUBGY
Capitalization748M20.3B4%
EBITDA-39.7M2.77B-1%
Gain YTD-51.22023.995-213%
P/E RatioN/A14.29-
Revenue603M14.8B4%
Total Cash29M3.68B1%
Total Debt96.6M6.19B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NXFNF vs PUBGY: Fundamental Ratings
NXFNF
PUBGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3814
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1007
SMR RATING
1..100
9864
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10068
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NXFNF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUBGY (72). This means that NXFNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUBGY’s over the last 12 months.

PUBGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NXFNF (100). This means that PUBGY’s stock grew significantly faster than NXFNF’s over the last 12 months.

PUBGY's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NXFNF (98). This means that PUBGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NXFNF’s over the last 12 months.

PUBGY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NXFNF (91). This means that PUBGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NXFNF’s over the last 12 months.

PUBGY's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as NXFNF (100). This means that PUBGY’s stock grew similarly to NXFNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NXFNFPUBGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NXFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUBGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFVEX28.06-0.23
-0.81%
DFA US Vector Equity I
PSMPX12.51-0.16
-1.26%
Penn Capital Mid Cap Core Inst
PSOAX25.87-0.37
-1.41%
JPMorgan Small Cap Value A
EIFGX28.40-0.91
-3.10%
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps I
VALSX35.02-4.79
-12.02%
Value Line Select Growth Fund

NXFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NXFNF and EZOO have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NXFNF and EZOO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NXFNF
1D Price
Change %
NXFNF100%
N/A
EZOO - NXFNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUBGY - NXFNF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
SCPPF - NXFNF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
PGPEF - NXFNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKUOY - NXFNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PUBGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PUBGY has been loosely correlated with WPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PUBGY jumps, then WPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUBGY
1D Price
Change %
PUBGY100%
-2.33%
WPP - PUBGY
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
DLX - PUBGY
39%
Loosely correlated
-5.89%
OMC - PUBGY
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
ZD - PUBGY
33%
Loosely correlated
-4.49%
IPG - PUBGY
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
More